Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs)
Revert to revision 443574961 dated 2011-08-07 22:00:04 by Szzuk using popups
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs)
Relisting debate
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}}


:{{la|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 July 31#{{anchorencode:ChristmasLightsEtc.com}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:{{la|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 August 9#{{anchorencode:ChristmasLightsEtc.com}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}})
:({{Find sources|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}})
Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for [[WP:GNG|notability]]. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for [[WP:GNG|notability]]. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Line 10: Line 10:
*'''Strong delete''' per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Strong delete''' per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
<hr style="width:55%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 13:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
<hr style="width:55%;" />

Revision as of 13:38, 9 August 2011

ChristmasLightsEtc.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. IvoShandor (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. SwisterTwister talk 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. Szzuk (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]