Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Revert to revision 443574961 dated 2011-08-07 22:00:04 by Szzuk using popups |
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) Relisting debate |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|W}} |
||
:{{la|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 |
:{{la|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChristmasLightsEtc.com|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 August 9#{{anchorencode:ChristmasLightsEtc.com}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}}) |
:({{Find sources|ChristmasLightsEtc.com}}) |
||
Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for [[WP:GNG|notability]]. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |
Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for [[WP:GNG|notability]]. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. [[User:IvoShandor|IvoShandor]] ([[User talk:IvoShandor|talk]]) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Strong delete''' per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Strong delete''' per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. [[User:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">SwisterTwister</font>]] [[User talk:SwisterTwister|<font color="green">talk</font>]] 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. [[User:Szzuk|Szzuk]] ([[User talk:Szzuk|talk]]) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
|||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> |
|||
:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 13:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] |
|||
<hr style="width:55%;" /> |
Revision as of 13:38, 9 August 2011
- ChristmasLightsEtc.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. The sources that appear are weak. Should be deleted. IvoShandor (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Strong delete per lack of notable mentions, media coverage in general. No notable sources were found on both Google and Yahoo! search, I believe this article may have been created solely for advertising purposes as well. SwisterTwister talk 21:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I checked 4 of the refs and they were trivial, from the looks of the others they will be the same, but I couldn't gurantee that without reading them. Szzuk (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)