User talk:68.207.250.67: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:14, 18 August 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.207.250.67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i didn't edit anything that's bad. theyre just trying to act like fools cause theyre trying to screw up elimination progresses for hell's kitchen

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:10, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Involved Editor's Commentary As one of the people attempting to keep the article correct and verifyable, we warned you several times [1] [2] [3] [4] that there was an existing consensus not to use extra colors and footnotes. Blanking the page is interpterted as having read and accepted the warning. When you went on the bulk changing of all the seasons without challenging the consensus or discussing it you stepped over the line of vandalism. Hasteur (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.207.250.67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me now

Decline reason:

No. Kuru (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

theres a lot of mean people pointing fingers at me and they keep throwing me under the bus. all i'm asking to be unblock very early

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :<small>Involved Editor's Commentary</small> As one of the people attempting to keep the article correct and verifyable, we warned you several times [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A68.207.250.67&action=historysubmit&diff=440291680&oldid=434283855] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.207.250.67&diff=next&oldid=440330854] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.207.250.67&diff=next&oldid=441691540] [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.207.250.67&diff=next&oldid=441752068] that there was an existing consensus not to use extra colors and footnotes.  Blanking the page is interpterted as having read and accepted the warning.  When you went on the bulk changing of all the seasons without challenging the consensus or discussing it you stepped over the line of vandalism. [[User:Hasteur|Hasteur]] ([[User talk:Hasteur|talk]]) 19:03, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 {{unblock reviewed | 1=unblock me now | decline=No. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 22:10, 18 August 2011 (UTC)}}
+theres a lot of mean people pointing fingers at me and they keep throwing me under the bus. all i'm asking to be unblock very early