Talk:Molly Parkin: Difference between revisions
Synchronized listas with DEFAULTSORT from article. |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Patsy Stone== |
==Patsy Stone== |
||
i wonder if she may have been the model for patsy stone, joanna lumley's character on absolutely fabulous? if so, that certainly deserves mention. [[User:Toyokuni3|Toyokuni3]] ([[User talk:Toyokuni3|talk]]) 14:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC) |
i wonder if she may have been the model for patsy stone, joanna lumley's character on absolutely fabulous? if so, that certainly deserves mention. [[User:Toyokuni3|Toyokuni3]] ([[User talk:Toyokuni3|talk]]) 14:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
== What is "most famous for exploits" supposed to mean?! == |
|||
"... who became most famous for exploits in the 1960s" |
|||
Without a mention of what sort of exploits the writer had in mind the sentence containing the above extract - the opening sentence of the article - conveys no useful information whatsoever. |
|||
Linguistically and educationally challenged Wikipedia writers strike again. Can we at least require some ability to express an idea using words before a person is let loose on editing this so-called encyclopedia? It is becoming increasingly difficult to find sentences and paragraphs that are written in good, conventional "American English", even, let alone English. |
Revision as of 20:22, 21 August 2011
Biography Start‑class | |||||||
|
Wales Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Journalism Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Patsy Stone
i wonder if she may have been the model for patsy stone, joanna lumley's character on absolutely fabulous? if so, that certainly deserves mention. Toyokuni3 (talk) 14:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
What is "most famous for exploits" supposed to mean?!
"... who became most famous for exploits in the 1960s"
Without a mention of what sort of exploits the writer had in mind the sentence containing the above extract - the opening sentence of the article - conveys no useful information whatsoever.
Linguistically and educationally challenged Wikipedia writers strike again. Can we at least require some ability to express an idea using words before a person is let loose on editing this so-called encyclopedia? It is becoming increasingly difficult to find sentences and paragraphs that are written in good, conventional "American English", even, let alone English.