Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techyv: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Boucetta (talk | contribs)
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Websites
Line 13: Line 13:


*I've added new references. You are invited to check their reliability. [[User:Boucetta|Boucetta]] ([[User talk:Boucetta|talk]]) 11:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
*I've added new references. You are invited to check their reliability. [[User:Boucetta|Boucetta]] ([[User talk:Boucetta|talk]]) 11:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Websites|list of Websites-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small> —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 14:56, 28 August 2011

Techyv (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. PROD was contested by the author without comment. Borderline A7, I would support a speedy if there is consensus for it here. VQuakr (talk) 04:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had another look at the links in the article, and none of them are secondary sources that go beyond a trivial listing of the web site. VQuakr (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is the neatstat.com also a non reliable reference ? Boucetta (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Tom Morris (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]