Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techyv: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:57, 28 August 2011

Techyv

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. PROD was contested by the author without comment. Borderline A7, I would support a speedy if there is consensus for it here. VQuakr (talk) 04:35, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Information in lead suggests it is not a notable website (ex. alexa ranking > 100,000) MadCow257 (talk) 04:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote in the first place invalid references. Would you please recheck the references. Boucetta (talk) 04:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had another look at the links in the article, and none of them are secondary sources that go beyond a trivial listing of the web site. VQuakr (talk) 05:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is the neatstat.com also a non reliable reference ? Boucetta (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added new references. You are invited to check their reliability. Boucetta (talk) 11:38, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete and nuke from orbit to be sure. No indications of notability, references do not establish notability, pure advertising/promotional fluff. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Pure weapons-grade vanispamcruftisement lacking WP:RS to satisfy WP:WEB or WP:GNG. Happy Editing! — 71.166.154.41 (talk · contribs) _{17:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)}[reply]
Strong delete, no prejudice to speedy A7 or possibly G11. No notability whatsoever, no third-party coverage. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 * '''Speedy delete''' and '''nuke from orbit to be sure'''. No indications of notability, references do not establish notability, pure advertising/promotional fluff. [[User:MikeWazowski|MikeWazowski]] ([[User talk:MikeWazowski|talk]]) 16:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * '''Speedy delete''' - Pure [[weapons-grade]] ''[[WP:VSCA|vanispamcruftisement]]'' lacking [[WP:RS]] to satisfy [[WP:WEB]] or [[WP:GNG]]. Happy Editing! &mdash; '''{{User|71.166.154.41}}''' <sub>17:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)</sub>
+*'''Strong delete''', no prejudice to speedy A7 or possibly G11. No notability whatsoever, no third-party coverage. --<font face="Book Antiqua">[[User:Kinu|<font color="blue"><strong>Kinu</strong></font>]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User_talk:Kinu|<font color="red">''t''</font>]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Kinu|<font color="red">''c''</font>]]</sub></font> 22:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)