Jump to content

Talk:Acadieman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DodoBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Tagging articles for WP:ANIMATION; Inheriting Start-class assessment
{{WikiProject Animation|class=Start|importance=Low|Canadian-animation=yes|Canadian-animation-importance=Low}}
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Animation|class=Start|auto=Inherit|importance=}}
{{WikiProject Animation|class=Start|importance=Low|Canadian-animation=yes|Canadian-animation-importance=Low}}
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 April 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Acadieman }}
{{oldafdfull| date = 20 April 2009 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Acadieman }}
{{Comicsproj|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{Comicsproj|class=Start|importance=Low}}

Revision as of 22:08, 29 August 2011

WikiProject iconAnimation: Canadian Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconComics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To whom have written the "Controversy" section, please avoid weasel words and add references to support the paragraph. Remi 03:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion?

This seems to have won awards so I am unsure if it can really be speedily deleted. (Emperor (talk) 03:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]