Jump to content

Talk:Dyewoods: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 69.72.27.1 - "Content?: new section"
Line 8: Line 8:
== Content? ==
== Content? ==


How do the different woods compare as to their dye content, method of processing, discovery, etc? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/69.72.27.1|69.72.27.1]] ([[User talk:69.72.27.1|talk]]) 06:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
How do the different woods compare as to their dye content, method of processing, discovery, etc? The Brazilwood article says little about the dye itself.[[Special:Contributions/69.72.27.1|69.72.27.1]] ([[User talk:69.72.27.1|talk]]) 06:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:32, 31 August 2011

WikiProject iconTextile arts List‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Dyewoods was previously redirected to Brazilwood, ignoring that there are others. I have rectifeid that. Peterkingiron 12:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content?

How do the different woods compare as to their dye content, method of processing, discovery, etc? The Brazilwood article says little about the dye itself.69.72.27.1 (talk) 06:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]