Jump to content

Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/JKL: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 216: Line 216:
* Yes link to en.wikipedia.org, no link to it.wikipedia.org
* Yes link to en.wikipedia.org, no link to it.wikipedia.org
* Attribution with an image not much readable and in English, instead the visitors are probably Italians.
* Attribution with an image not much readable and in English, instead the visitors are probably Italians.

=== libelpedia.org ===
{{Mirror
| name = libelpedia.org
| url = <nowiki>http://libelpedia.org/</nowiki> [http://libelpedia.org/ http://libelpedia.org/]
| sample = <nowiki>http://libelpedia.org/</nowiki> [http://libelpedia.org/ http://libelpedia.org/]
| rating = "Low/None"
| compliance = This site currently presents itself as a new, unedited Wikimedia Foundation wiki
| contact = [http://reports.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=libelpedia.org&type=domain The domain registrant name and address] (Thomas Archer, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA) are bogus. The address is a USGS office in Menlo Park. The phone number is clearly bogus: Registrant Phone:+1.8005551212. The registrant email is valid and is believed to be actually in use by [[Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey]], blocked user [[User:Gadugi]], blocked user [[User:Waya_sahoni]], and [[User:67.137.28.188]] Registrant Email:tjarcher@comcast.net. This email address [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bookofsecrets/Archive_2 has been used by] User:Waya_sahoni. The web site itself is refered to at [http://www.wikigadugi.org/index.php/User_talk:Red_Bear Merkey/Gadugi/Waya sahoni's new wiki], wikigadugi.org. Also see: stalkerpedia.org
| action = I feel that dealing with this potentially libelous web site is probably best left to Wikimedia foundation legal counsel.
}}


=== LincolnMortgage.info ===
=== LincolnMortgage.info ===

Revision as of 09:29, 21 March 2006

Mirrors and Forks : (Numbers) ABC - DEF - GHI - JKL - MNO - PQR - STU - VWXYZ - All - Archive

J

Japan-101

  • No mention of GFDL Mentioned at footer of each article. Links to local copy.
  • No mention of Wikipedia Cited as source with link at footer of each article.
  • Has the tautological "copyrights are property of the owners" Has been removed.


One article in particular Hadaka Apron, but there probably are others. It doesn't use the latest version. Paranoid 13:09, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Jiggies

Jiskha Homework Help

Jiskha Homework Help
URL http://www.jiskha.com/
Description
Sample http://www.jiskha.com/social_studies/people/king_jr_martin_luther.html
Rating None
Compliance No mention of Wikipedia or the GFDL on the front page or on the articles. Pages contain the text "Copyright © 1998-2006 Jiskha Homework Help. All rights reserved."
Contact info http://www.jiskha.com/contact/
Actions Standard violation letter sent (06:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC))

Juicee News Daily

  • No mention of GFDL
  • Links to original Wikipedia article as "Reference"
  • Claims copyright: "Copyright © 2005 Juicee News Daily. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the written consent of juiceenewsdaily. To inquire about the use of juiceenwsdaily material, please email press@juiceenewsdaily.com."

Example article: [6]; there are others. DanKeshet 23:29, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

Sent first warning for including GFDL notice, as I'm not sure if notice was sent before. Cleduc 5 July 2005 01:49 (UTC)

Second example

Also Socialite is copied, but without any attribution. Sent notice -- don't know if anyone else has sent them notice before. Not sure, so we'll treat this as first notice. Cleduc 5 July 2005 01:37 (UTC)

  • Notice resulted in a "Reference" being placed on the page -- so the source is attributed. However, the GFDL notice is not placed on the page, just like the CPR article. I'm going to follow up with the editor/publisher. Cleduc 6 July 2005 18:23 (UTC)

Third example

[7] from Jack Abramoff. No GFDL notice, no mention of Wikipedia. -- Antaeus Feldspar 20:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth example

[8] from Bona fide purchaser. No GFDL notice, no mention of Wikipedia. "Copyright © 2005" is a link to the Wikipedia article. Robert A West 03:29, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K

Kapitalism.net

  • Site: http:// www.kapitalism.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
  • Example: http:// www.kapitalism.net/wiki/index.php?title=Virginia_Woolf
  • Uses content from Wikipedia without attribution. Releases under a different license: http:// www.kapitalism.net/wiki/index.php?title=Lirpedia:CopyCommunism
  • Is run by User:Lir

Kids.net.au

Kiessecker

Killersudoku

Kiwipedia

  • Site: http://www.kiwipedia.com
  • Example: [9]: initial part of Albania
  • No attribution to Wikipedia
  • No link to original page
  • Apparent link to GFDL at bottom is to initial part of local article about license, which in turn has broken link to GNU version
    • As of 10:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC) Henrygb

Klasikoyun.com

This site is violating GFDL. No attribution, no link to Wikipedia. Links to Wikipedia from main page

  • Some links to Wikipedia
  • No mention of source/GFDL
  • seems to be under construction

Moved from main page Davelane 22:58, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC) This was deleted by 212.174.228.10 (Removed Klasikoyun.com site has an attribution in the main page) I've restored this as I beleve they are not in compliance -- if you disagree please move to disputed. --Davelane 16:32, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Site is down now, I'll delist it soon (feel free to do it if I forget). Rhobite 20:29, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
It's back up now, and still infringing. Rhobite 21:32, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

knolix.com

Knowledgerush

  • Links to local copy of GNU/FDL
  • Names Wikipedia and links to source article.
  • Does not have "title page".

Several articles copied, hard to say how many. Tualha 19:00, 18 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Looks like everything with the possible exception of orphans and semi-orphans to me. Andre Engels 17:33, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

KnowLex

  • In en: and de:; I only really looked at the former.
  • Bottom of each page links to:
    • Source article on Wikipedia;
    • Wikipedia main page;
    • GNU FDL on FSF site;
    • Author list (history) on Wikipedia; and
    • Edit link on Wikipedia.

OK, so they should have a local copy of the licence. But they also say "The article can be editted here." and I think that's fantastic!!! -- Toby Bartels 04:38, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)


KnowledgeGeek

Knowledgegeek now looks close to compliance, acknowledging Wikipedia as the original source and linking to the GFDL. Do people agree that they are now largely compliant? --Robert Merkel 04:30, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
The site has definitely improved. However, witness all the 'summary' pages one level in from the root page (such as Coffee) still being composed largely of Wikipedia content without any acknowledgement. A sentence or two, lifted directly from Wikipedia is shown in many entries on those 'summary' pages (such as Drip brew, French press, Caffeine, etc. on the Coffee page above) yet you must click through to the full text before a Wikipedia or GFDL reference is made. A reference to Wikipedia and GFDL on all pages with even 'truncated' Wikipedia content (ie, the first few sentences of a bunch of articles) would still seem to be required. Potentially also worth mentioning is that the engine or template system used by KnowledgeGeek is used by StudioReview.com (documented on this page and supported/linked by Mark Coffman of KnowledgeGeek) and as of this writing, StudioReview has a low degree of compliance. I'm not suggesting that the owner/operator of KnowledgeGeek is able to accomplish this, but one wonders if it's possible to add compliance at an engine- or template-level for sites like this which are clearly copying Wikipedia content in huge quantities. Ds13 20:46, 2004 Mar 11 (UTC)
The remaining problems identified above seem to be addressed now. I would agree that they are largely compliant now. --Ds13 06:50, 2004 Mar 21 (UTC)

Knowledge Is Fun

  • site: knowledgeisfun.com
  • A TOTAL ripoff of wikipedia. Claims copyright as own!--Deglr6328 23:11, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • No mention of Wikipedia
  • No link to GFDL
  • Contains text "Copyright © 2004 KnowledgeIsFun.com, all rights reserved."
  • Sent first letter to domainsatvizaginfo.com and @kif (best contacts aval.) --Davelane 00:03, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Response: "Thanks for informing about the missing copyright message. The website is maintained by one of our client who has informed us back that the necessary copyright message has been put."
  • Now contains text "Copyright © 2004 KnowledgeIsFun.com, all rights reserved. This article was derived fully or in part from an article on Wikipedia.org] - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License. " --Davelane 16:45, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Knowledge King

Knowledge King
URL http://www.knowledgeking.net
Description
Sample http://www.knowledgeking.net/encyclopedia/a/al/albania_1.html
Rating
Compliance Ends with "This content from wikipedia is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Brought to you by System0." Links only to Wikipedia main page; no direct link to article or inclusion of history.
Contact info
Actions

Knows-It-All

Knows-It-All
URL http://www.homestayfinder.com/
Description
Sample http://www.homestayfinder.com/Dictionary.aspx?q=Dan_Marsh
Rating High
Compliance Mentions GFDL. Links to Wikipedia. Mentions copyright status.
Contact info abuse@discountasp.net, abuse@domainsbyproxy.com, HOMESTAYFINDER.COM@domainsbyproxy.com (private)
Actions

L

LaborLawTalk

  • Site: [14]
  • Complete mirror of all Wikipedia articles
  • Example: [15]
  • Does not link to GFDL or Wikipedia. Does not mention them at all.
  • Claims "Copyright © 2004 LaborLawTalk.com All rights reserved." at the bottom of every page.
  • The Wikipedia background image appears before the page loads fully. It seems that they have not done a good job of plagiarising.
    • Sent standard letter. Vacuum c 01:59, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
      • They do mention the GFDL and Wikipedia now, at least in the linked example page. —mikko (speak) 21:57, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • They also mention it on other pages, see: [16]
      • No obvious copyright statement now except GFDL link to gnu.org original 20:34, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

latitudezero.org

Lexikonia.org

A local copy of italian wikipedia.

  • Site: [18]
  • Example [19]
  • No link to the current version of article
  • Yes link to en.wikipedia.org, no link to it.wikipedia.org
  • Attribution with an image not much readable and in English, instead the visitors are probably Italians.

libelpedia.org

libelpedia.org
URL http://libelpedia.org/ http://libelpedia.org/
Description
Sample http://libelpedia.org/ http://libelpedia.org/
Rating "Low/None"
Compliance This site currently presents itself as a new, unedited Wikimedia Foundation wiki
Contact info The domain registrant name and address (Thomas Archer, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA) are bogus. The address is a USGS office in Menlo Park. The phone number is clearly bogus: Registrant Phone:+1.8005551212. The registrant email is valid and is believed to be actually in use by Jeffrey_Vernon_Merkey, blocked user User:Gadugi, blocked user User:Waya_sahoni, and User:67.137.28.188 Registrant Email:tjarcher@comcast.net. This email address has been used by User:Waya_sahoni. The web site itself is refered to at Merkey/Gadugi/Waya sahoni's new wiki, wikigadugi.org. Also see: stalkerpedia.org
Actions I feel that dealing with this potentially libelous web site is probably best left to Wikimedia foundation legal counsel.

LincolnMortgage.info

Only a selection of pages, from all namespace of en.wp. Very random. Very odd interface.

Linix Encyclopedia

literaturemania.com

  • Site: literaturemania.com
  • Example: [20]
  • No attribution
  • No GFDL notice
  • No copyright information of any sort, just "ads" about "Discount Pet Supplies" and an offsite link
  • Refers to Wikipedia text section as "The Project Gutenberg Encyclopedia"
  • Appears to be some sort of Project Gutenberg and (non-compliant) Wikipedia mirror

liverpoolcityportal.co.uk

Now seems to comply, having used the suggested text I sent them through the form letter. Am going to ask them to see if the copyright notice can be clarified, though. Johnleemk | Talk 12:57, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All is in order now. Johnleemk | Talk 17:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

localcolorart.com

Localcolorartandothers
URL http://www.localcolorart.com
Description
Sample http://www.localcolorart.com/encyclopedia/Recreation/
Rating High
Compliance
Contact info
Actions Contacted everyone. No replies from the admin. ISP contacted. -- WB 01:33, 20 January 2006 (UTC) (Admin says they did not receive email).[reply]

Additionally the following domain names are equivalent sites:

  • http://209.197.127.220
  • http://209.197.89.145
  • http://209.68.55.237
  • http://209.68.55.246
  • http://209.68.55.253
  • http://209.68.55.254
  • http://216.92.11.22
  • http://216.92.11.26
  • http://216.92.11.9
  • http://216.92.85.60
  • http://alienartifacts.com
  • http://alky.com
  • http://allaccounts.com
  • http://allsfair.com
  • http://allthesights.com
  • http://anewlow.com
  • http://aplaceinthesun.com
  • http://artandcraftdirectory.com
  • http://artbytexans.com
  • http://artfulandcrafty.com
  • http://artgreats.com
  • http://artisticnudity.com
  • http://artlives.com
  • http://artoftexans.com
  • http://artoftexas.com
  • http://artquilt.com
  • http://artsintexas.com
  • http://barehands.com
  • http://barreloflaughs.com
  • http://beattherap.com
  • http://bettersafe.com
  • http://bloomingidiot.com
  • http://bornyesterday.com
  • http://buytexasart.com
  • http://ceramicartist.com
  • http://checkcards.com
  • http://classactionsuits.com
  • http://colorfool.com
  • http://colorfulimaginations.com
  • http://compaw.com
  • http://completeidiot.com
  • http://completeidiots.com
  • http://completeidiotsguide.com
  • http://createdbygod.com
  • http://cutanddried.com
  • http://demoz.org
  • http://dirtyart.com
  • http://doordie.com
  • http://doublestandard.com
  • http://earthlybusiness.com
  • http://earwitnessnews.com
  • http://everyavenue.com
  • http://fabricarts.com
  • http://fashionableinteriors.com
  • http://fbgart.com
  • http://fbg-tx.com
  • http://fburg.com
  • http://featuredlinks.com
  • http://fiestatexas.com
  • http://folkartmuseum.com
  • http://fredericksburgart.com
  • http://fredericksburgartists.com
  • http://fredericksburgarts.com
  • http://fredericksburger.com
  • http://fredericksburggallery.com
  • http://freshbrewed.com
  • http://globalists.com
  • http://greatartwork.com
  • http://greatartworks.com
  • http://guidinglight.com
  • http://handoverfist.com
  • http://higherpower.net
  • http://higherpower.org
  • http://higherpowered.org
  • http://hillcountryart.com
  • http://hillcountryartgallery.com
  • http://hillcountryartist.com
  • http://hillcountryartists.com
  • http://hillcountryarts.com
  • http://hollywoodblockbuster.com
  • http://hotandcold.com
  • http://huboftheuniverse.com
  • http://innerman.com
  • http://interiorbeauty.com
  • http://internetnavigator.com
  • http://jobsinart.com
  • http://karr.net
  • http://kilnfired.com
  • http://kingsized.com
  • http://kurtiskarr.com
  • http://landcompany.com
  • http://landscapenavigator.com
  • http://launchbase.com
  • http://launchbase.net
  • http://launchbase.org
  • http://lifeanddeath.com
  • http://livingdangerously.com
  • http://localartgallery.com
  • http://localcolor.info
  • http://localcolorart.com
  • http://localcolorartists.com
  • http://localcolorarts.com
  • http://localcolors.com
  • http://localfineart.com
  • http://locolcolor.com
  • http://lokalkolorit.com
  • http://lokalkolorit.de
  • http://lonestararts.com
  • http://matronofthearts.com
  • http://merica.com
  • http://metalworkart.com
  • http://mouseclique.com
  • http://mylocalcolor.com
  • http://nativeartworks.com
  • http://naturalresearch.com
  • http://naturalresearch.org
  • http://neverclosed.com
  • http://omnipresent.net
  • http://omnipresent.org
  • http://oneonly.com
  • http://onlinereligion.com
  • http://orderlyfashion.com
  • http://ourlocalcolor.com
  • http://overthetopart.com
  • http://overthetopartgallery.com
  • http://overthetopgallery.com
  • http://parksandwildlife.com
  • http://popularityguide.com
  • http://priceoffreedom.com
  • http://quiltplace.com
  • http://selectpicks.com
  • http://sifi.com
  • http://somelocalcolor.com
  • http://somethingpersonal.com
  • http://stardustmemories.com
  • http://studstill.com
  • http://stylishinteriors.com
  • http://technicalstuff.com
  • http://texanaccents.com
  • http://texanartists.com
  • http://thearts.us
  • http://thebottomdollar.com
  • http://theentireweb.com
  • http://thelateshift.com
  • http://thelocalcolorartgallery.com
  • http://thelocalcolorgallery.com
  • http://themajors.com
  • http://thepriceoffreedom.com
  • http://thetreasuretrove.com
  • http://toat.com
  • http://trafficstop.com
  • http://usgrant.com
  • http://variedtastes.com
  • http://worldlygoods.com
  • http://worthaclick.com
  • http://wwwebster.com
  • http://xxxl.com
  • http://yourbestdeal.com
  • http://youvegotcredit.com/

logicjungle.com

  • Site: logicjungle.com
  • Mirror of the english wikipedia
  • Link to GNU FDL.
  • Link to www.wikipedia.org (from the icon)
  • Crediting links to original articles
We can class this is as 'well behaved' mirror. Phil from logicjungle proactively read the listing here and emailed me. I suggested some improvements to the wording of the article links, to give proper credit to wikipedia, which were quickly implemented.
If any further contact is necessary, it might as well go through me, or a I can provide a copy of the email conversation we had -- Nojer2 10:09, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The Logo (A Book)

  • Site: The Logo (A Book)
  • Uses the article about the book: "No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies"
  • Mentions Wikipedia, and provides a link to the front page
  • No GFDL Link
  • Looks like fair use.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/JKL&oldid=44793169"