User talk:Xiaoyu of Yuxi: Difference between revisions
Anachronist (talk | contribs) Please stop with the CSD tags |
Revert to the revision prior to revision 449187563 dated 2011-09-08 19:37:49 by Amatulic using popups: already done that |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Secondly, although I prefer working in quiet, my efforts over the past 5 months regarding mentioning the mere existence of towns, townships, etc. have not been appreciated or recognised enough. There is something drastically wrong when coverage of miscellaneous topics far exceeds coverage of administrative divisions that house tens of millions (e.g. almost all articles on mainland settlements or political divisions). |
Secondly, although I prefer working in quiet, my efforts over the past 5 months regarding mentioning the mere existence of towns, townships, etc. have not been appreciated or recognised enough. There is something drastically wrong when coverage of miscellaneous topics far exceeds coverage of administrative divisions that house tens of millions (e.g. almost all articles on mainland settlements or political divisions). |
||
==Speedy delete tags - please stop== |
|||
Please cease placing CSD tags on articles to which you contributed. They will not be deleted simply because you wish to vanish. |
|||
If you wish to vanish, see [[WP:VANISH]] and request that a bureaucrat rename your account so that the article histories no longer trace to you. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 19:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:38, 8 September 2011
Firstly, the administrators (sysops). When an organisation allows for even one person of authority to fail to serve as a great example to others, e.g. when that person displays a poor temperament, it reflects poorly on that organisation. When the admins of an organisation vet for those independence-minded persons (I am talking about what occurred in early December 2010 at the Taiwan article...such activists deserve to be terminated with extreme prejudice) who go about disrupting articles inserting their bogus POV over those who enforce a strict standard of neutrality, I can be part of that organisation no more.
Secondly, although I prefer working in quiet, my efforts over the past 5 months regarding mentioning the mere existence of towns, townships, etc. have not been appreciated or recognised enough. There is something drastically wrong when coverage of miscellaneous topics far exceeds coverage of administrative divisions that house tens of millions (e.g. almost all articles on mainland settlements or political divisions).