Jump to content

Template talk:WikiProject Visual arts: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 18: Line 18:


== Please replace image ==
== Please replace image ==
{{edit protected|yes}}
{{edit protected|ans=yes}}
The current image ([[:File:WPVisualArts.png]]) should be replaced with its SVG version, [[:File:WPVisualArts.svg]]. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The current image ([[:File:WPVisualArts.png]]) should be replaced with its SVG version, [[:File:WPVisualArts.svg]]. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
:{{done|Okay}} &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
:{{done|Okay}} &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:30, 30 September 2011

missing C-class category

{{editprotected}} The template is not evaluating "c" as a category. As per discussion on the project page this should be corrected. The missing code appears to be

 |c|C=[[Category:C-Class visual arts articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]

Thanks Enki H. (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --- RockMFR 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Importance parameter

Should this not have a field for "importance", as in Template:WikiProject Pornography, and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? Ty 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. Johnbod (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace image

The current image (File:WPVisualArts.png) should be replaced with its SVG version, File:WPVisualArts.svg. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Okay — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]