Template talk:WikiProject Visual arts: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Please replace image: okay |
→Please replace image: disable |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Please replace image == |
== Please replace image == |
||
{{edit protected|yes}} |
{{edit protected|ans=yes}} |
||
The current image ([[:File:WPVisualArts.png]]) should be replaced with its SVG version, [[:File:WPVisualArts.svg]]. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
The current image ([[:File:WPVisualArts.png]]) should be replaced with its SVG version, [[:File:WPVisualArts.svg]]. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --[[User:Gyrobo|Gyrobo]] ([[User talk:Gyrobo|talk]]) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
:{{done|Okay}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC) |
:{{done|Okay}} — Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]] · [[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:30, 30 September 2011
missing C-class category
{{editprotected}} The template is not evaluating "c" as a category. As per discussion on the project page this should be corrected. The missing code appears to be
|c|C=[[Category:C-Class visual arts articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
Thanks Enki H. (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done. --- RockMFR 02:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Importance parameter
Should this not have a field for "importance", as in Template:WikiProject Pornography, and maybe "listas" (not sure if that's necessary or not)? Ty 13:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Perhaps we should try to agree a quick "sample" list of articles with ratings to help assessors. Don't know about "listas". Johnbod (talk) 13:41, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- It would need adapting; it's a very different world! "Under no circumstances should any individual person be assigned top importance" would not work for us I think. Johnbod (talk) 15:08, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is a very useful model for guidance here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Assessment, which could be adapted. Ty 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Please replace image
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The current image (File:WPVisualArts.png) should be replaced with its SVG version, File:WPVisualArts.svg. Vector images scale better, and the replacement image provides a more crisp image at 80px. --Gyrobo (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Okay — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)