User talk:68.109.223.137: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:12, 25 March 2006

Please read Talk:Fox News Channel before reverting again. — Ilyan e p (Talk) 18:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will you PLEASE read and respond to the talk page! I wasn't destroying the article, I was simply moving it to a seperate article! — Ilyan e p (Talk) 18:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for violation of Wikipedia's 3 revert rule Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 18:47, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Back again? Please read the talk page. — Ilyan e p (Talk) 18:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've violated 3RR on Fox News Channel - and accused me of being a sockpuppet. Please discuss civilly on the talk page - "I got all day" doesn't indicate a desire for consensus. Trödeltalk 23:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check your facts, Trodel - (1) I never called any specific person a sockpuppet, and (2) I was the first to be accused of sockpuppetry on the Talk page {"You may want to do a sockpuppet check on 68.109.223.137. --Aaron 18:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)" "I wish I could. I might report it on AN/I — Ilyanep (Talk) 18:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)"} If you want civility, take the time to read what I wrote rather than revert 30 seconds after my edit. I spent a while enumerating a decent argument, and my edit was reverted within the minute (this is a matter of record).

Blocked 48 hours for repeat edit warring and 3RR violations. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 22:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse, for anyone interested, but this isn't exactly my own person IP address. Why can't I access the page for edits? Even the talk page is blocked from me. That's highly suspect, and I hardly think worthy of any genuinely "fair" organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.223.137 (talk • contribs)

Peter North's Penis Size

I don't see how you or anyone else can possibly believe Peter North's penis to be of average size. Please see these four links for plenty of comparative pics, which illustrate just how truly huge his appendage really is:

| http://www.yummystars.com/galleries/pn/alicia_rhodes/ Warning: Contains explicit sexual content

| http://www.freepornofreeporn.com/free_pic/gallery_018/pornstar/peter_north/pooecopicda.html Warning: Contains explicit sexual content

| http://fapomatic.com/show.php?loc=49&f=peter_northvery_very_big01.jpg Warning: Contains explicit sexual content

| http://fapomatic.com/show.php?loc=49&f=peter_northvery_very_big02.jpg Warning: Contains explicit sexual content

Considering that the average woman's head is close to 8 inches in length from chin to hairline, and North's penis is seldom shorter than his female co-stars' heads, that makes his listed length of 8.5 inches a fair, if not somewhat conservative, estimate. The same goes for his reported girth of 6 inches. Please see Peter North's discussion page for additional commentary, especially my notes concerning the statistics of human penis size.

I'm 6'3", and my head is 7 1/2" from chin to hairline. Again, I ask you, what "average" women are you referring to?

Solcis 17:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to John Holmes. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 00:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism?"? That's a pretty ugly word coming from an administrator; let's check out the difference between what I posted, and what you reverted it to: http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=John_Holmes_%28actor%29&diff=45189229&oldid=45130450 What on earth here constitutes vandalism?

I have a disagreement with Solcis, and I referenced my material with a much more in-depth examination of the evidence. Please show me where, in doing so, I vandalized the article!

Thanks.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 You've violated 3RR on [[Fox News Channel]] - and accused me of being a [[WP:NPA|sockpuppet]]. Please discuss civilly on the talk page - "[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&diff=prev&oldid=35169863 I got all day]" doesn't indicate a desire for consensus. [[User:Trödel|Trödel]]&#149;<font color="#F0F">[[User_talk:Trödel|talk]]</font> 23:01, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
-*'''Check your facts, Trodel''' - (1) I never called any specific person a sockpuppet, and (2) I was the first to be accused of sockpuppetry on the Talk page.  If you want civility, take the time to read what I wrote rather than revert 30 seconds after my edit.
+*'''Check your facts, Trodel''' - (1) I never called any specific person a sockpuppet, and (2) I was the first to be accused of sockpuppetry on the Talk page ''{"You may want to do a sockpuppet check on 68.109.223.137. --Aaron 18:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)"  "I wish I could. I might report it on AN/I — Ilyanep (Talk) 18:31, 14 January 2006 (UTC)"}''  If you want civility, take the time to read what I wrote rather than revert 30 seconds after my edit.  I spent a while enumerating a decent argument, and my edit was reverted within the minute (this is a matter of record).
 Blocked 48 hours for repeat edit warring and 3RR violations. <small>[[User:Jtkiefer|<font color="red">Jtkiefer</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Jtkiefer|<font color="orange">T</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jtkiefer|<font color="green">C</font>]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Jtkiefer|<font color="blue">@</font>]]</sup></small>  ---- 22:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)