Talk:Early childhood: Difference between revisions
Ewoodruff13 (talk | contribs) |
gave edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
JennZmaila I corrected some spelling and grammer mistakes but the overall information was very useful for the article. You also need to cite your information! [[User:Ewoodruff13|Ewoodruff13]] ([[User talk:Ewoodruff13|talk]]) 17:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
JennZmaila I corrected some spelling and grammer mistakes but the overall information was very useful for the article. You also need to cite your information! [[User:Ewoodruff13|Ewoodruff13]] ([[User talk:Ewoodruff13|talk]]) 17:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
I only corrected some minor spelling errors, but the information is very useful. The paragraph you did write does need a source still. --[[User:Lwilmes|Lwilmes]] ([[User talk:Lwilmes|talk]]) 02:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:24, 10 October 2011
Psychology Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
To make this article better, the first thing it needs is sources. More research, photos, and description would make this article a lot better. Each section I think to improve needs at least two or three paragraphs for adequate information for readers. --Lwilmes (talk) 01:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
psych 101 edit
Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94
psych 101 edit
Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94
psych 101 edit
Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94
psych 101 edit
Your contribution added a lot more information. The only things i changed were i put your information in a different section so it wouldnt stay all in one long line and fixed a few spelling errors.--MeganJacobsmeyer94 (talk) 20:18, 8 October 2011 (UTC)MeganJacobsmeyer94
JennZmaila I corrected some spelling and grammer mistakes but the overall information was very useful for the article. You also need to cite your information! Ewoodruff13 (talk) 17:06, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I only corrected some minor spelling errors, but the information is very useful. The paragraph you did write does need a source still. --Lwilmes (talk) 02:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)