User talk:Buffs/IP & New Users: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:53, 18 October 2011

Due to persistent harassment from an indef blocked user, my main talk page is semi-protected. Accordingly, I've created this page which is exclusively for IP users and Newly Registered Users.

I added the links to What in the World are they Spraying to the Talk page - but as for the congressional stuff, dunno where and not got time to look that out. As there seems to be a bit of an edit war on the page - I leave it to you or those that want to add mention of the movie into the page. - Of course critical review of the movie would be good too. BUT as of now IMDB lists it as a documentary.

M —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear respected sir,

I would suggest that you also read and respect Wikipedia's user edibility in regards to my edit from Texas Qatar A&M page. Wikipedia is where it is due to generosity from users like me who take out the time and contribute to it the truth as I (an employee and resident of Education City) see it, despite its rather foggy credibility.

However I also appreciate and respect your right to freely edit any Wikipedia page.

regards, Hurfy Durfy Hamrak

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.36.49.1 (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to have a look under research - I'm assuming that Hut101 added the part about the Nuclear Science Center (back in 01/2007), but the way he wrote it, it would appear that A&M got a new reactor, when in fact all that happened was the reactor was refueled, with fuel that has a lower U235 content. In other words, the first 2 lines of the last paragraph are completely wrong, and should be fixed ASAP. Check the article he linked it to for verification (Reference #68). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.198.10 (talk) 09:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

360training.com Conflict of Interest issue

Re: discussions on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:360training_wikimaster

Thank you for coming to my aid, Buffs. I would be very thankful indeed for anything you could share from your experience about COI issues. I'm an editor and I understand editors are bound to have disagreements. But I am willing to be bound to a commitment to produce an objective article -- no less objective than that of Blackboard or HSBC, or the University of Phoenix which I'm using as models of sorts.

My immediate problem is that Daniel Case has blocked my account. He gives helpful advice and says I need to either create a new username or change my username. He suggests the former more strongly. My only problem with that is that I don't want to lose the trail of helpful (albeit somewhat tedious) discussions about COI. So I'm opting to go the "change username" route. I tried to do this but was unable to....

If you can view my talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:360training_wikimaster , this message appears:

>This blocked user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username. 360training wikimaster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock)

Requested username: your new username here (talk · new username here account availability check)<

The new username I'm trying to create is fatherseyes_snapblogs . But this doesn't seem to be reflected here.

I would value your opinions and advice. Am I taking the right route? Why can't I change my username? Thanks