Jump to content

Converged storage: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Comparisons to traditional storage architectures: added sentence and additonal reference
m →Common software: added Wikilink and small edits
Line 11: Line 11:


==Common software==
==Common software==
In server virtualization, multiple “virtual” servers operate on a single platform using [[hypervisor]] technology. These virtual servers could be running traditional server tasks, such as applications programming. By using storage controller software, these servers could also be made into data storage systems.<ref>Asaro, Tony. "The impact of virtual storage appliances," SearchStorage.com[http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/magazineContent/The-impact-of-virtual-storage-appliances]</ref> This latter architecture is known as [[virtual machine]]-based storage. The storage software is often called a VSA−virtual SAN appliance<ref>SearchStorage.com, "What is virtual SAN appliance (VSA)"[http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/definition/virtual-SAN-appliance]</ref> or virtual storage appliance. VSA is the name of software from HP that allows users to build storage-area networks using their existing servers.<ref>Garret, Brian. "ESG Lab Review: HP P4000 SAN: Affordable, Scalable, Reliable Storage," March 25, 2010, Enterprise Strategy Group [http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/03/esg-lab-review-hp-p4000-san-affordable-scalable-reliable-storage/]</ref> It is also the name of software from VMware that enables shared storage for virtual machines. <ref>Orenstein, Gary. "VMware’s slow and steady attack on storage," GigaOm, August 27, 2011[http://gigaom.com/cloud/vmwares-slow-and-steady-attack-on-storage/]</ref>
In server virtualization, multiple “virtual” servers operate on a single platform using [[hypervisor]] technology. These virtual servers could be running traditional server tasks, such as applications programming. By using storage controller software, these servers could also be made into data storage systems.<ref>Asaro, Tony. "The impact of virtual storage appliances," SearchStorage.com[http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/magazineContent/The-impact-of-virtual-storage-appliances.</ref> This latter architecture is known as [[virtual machine]]-based storage. The storage software is often called a VSA−virtual SAN appliance<ref>SearchStorage.com, "What is virtual SAN appliance (VSA)"[http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/definition/virtual-SAN-appliance]</ref> or virtual storage appliance. VSA is the name of software from HP that allows users to build storage-area networks using their existing servers.<ref>Garret, Brian. "ESG Lab Review: HP P4000 SAN: Affordable, Scalable, Reliable Storage," March 25, 2010, Enterprise Strategy Group [http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2010/03/esg-lab-review-hp-p4000-san-affordable-scalable-reliable-storage/]</ref> It is also the name of software from [[VMware]] that enables shared storage for virtual machines.<ref>Orenstein, Gary. "VMware’s slow and steady attack on storage," GigaOm, August 27, 2011[http://gigaom.com/cloud/vmwares-slow-and-steady-attack-on-storage/]</ref>


==Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)==
==Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)==

Revision as of 18:47, 18 October 2011

Converged storage[1] is a storage architecture that combines storage and compute into a single entity.[2] This can result in the development of platforms for server centric, storage centric or hybrid workloads where applications and data come together to improve application performance and delivery.[3] The combination of storage and compute differs to the traditional IT model in which computation and storage take place in separate or siloed computer equipment.[4] The traditional model can become a bottleneck as data sets gets bigger and the time to access that data gets shorter.[5]

Design considerations

The goal of converged storage is to bring together server and storage [6] and/or application and data to deliver services that are better optimized for target workloads.[7] This can mean server and storage converged within a common hardware platform. For example, a blade server enclosure, applications and storage can be brought together within a server by virtualization. Server and storage can be managed as a resource pool, for example in infrastructure- as-a-service (IaaS).

Common hardware platform

Industry standard servers, such as those using Intel processors (x86), form the basis of converged storage.[8][9] As these servers follow Moore’s Law and increase power and performance they have the capabilities to run storage workloads, in addition to being compute servers. Data centers can further consolidate and minimize the use of physical space and energy by using industry-standard –based blade server for both server and storage.[10][11]

Common software

In server virtualization, multiple “virtual” servers operate on a single platform using hypervisor technology. These virtual servers could be running traditional server tasks, such as applications programming. By using storage controller software, these servers could also be made into data storage systems.[12] This latter architecture is known as virtual machine-based storage. The storage software is often called a VSA−virtual SAN appliance[13] or virtual storage appliance. VSA is the name of software from HP that allows users to build storage-area networks using their existing servers.[14] It is also the name of software from VMware that enables shared storage for virtual machines.[15]

Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)

The goal of IaaS is to provide a pool of resources[16] that can be quickly deployed to deliver new services. This requires a service designer to lay out the required characteristics for a new service or application and an orchestration (computing) engine[17] to configure the underlying infrastructure to deliver the new service.

Characteristics

Scale-out architecture

Scale-out architecture is a component of converged storage. Scale-out storage is the combination of modular computers and standardized storage components to create federated storage pools.[18] The result is an increase of computer power, bandwidth and storage capacity that can exceed that of a single traditional storage array or high performance computer.[19] Storage vendors such as Hewlett-Packard and EMC provide scale-out storage to address both the growth of unstructured data and the need to simplify data center operations.[20]

Scale-out storage differs from scale-up architectures in traditional storage, which primarily scales by adding many individual disk drives to a single non-clustered storage controller.[21] In a scale-out architecture, management software is used to manage the multiple storage devices, to act like a single system.[22] Storage analyst company, Enterprise Strategy Group, writes that scale-out storage can help to provide timely IT provisioning, improve system availability and provide better resource utilization.[23]

Federation

Storage federation (also known as federated storage) uses distributed volume management to shift workloads from busy arrays to those with available capacity. This is done using native peer-to-peer communication.[24] Multiple autonomous storage systems are combined and managed as a single storage pool.[25] This helps to improve storage utilization, balance workloads and ease storage migration.

Multitenant architecture

Converged storage supports the multitenant (multitenancy) architecture of cloud computing, in which multiple machines or users access the virtual and physical resources at the same time. In addition to storage, the other resources accessed in this architecture are processors and networks.[26] A converged storage does this by moving application workloads between disk systems.[27]

Comparisons to traditional storage architectures

Monolithic storage architectures

Monolithic storage architectures have been characterized as large storage arrays that require a large upfront investment and resources. Hitachi Data Systems, is quoted as saying such storage requires enterprises to spend $500,000 on customizing their data centers to support the power requirements of monolithic equipment.[28] Monolithic arrays provide failover benefits. The shared cache architecture of monolithic arrays ensures that if one cache module fails, another cache is used to process the user's request. However once you have more than a single system this architecture is complex and requires investment to manage and control the interactions between the different components.[29] Monolithic architectures support both block and file-based architectures, either independently or in a unified storage system that brings together both block and file.[30]


Direct-attached storage

Direct-attached storage (DAS) provides scaling of storage directly attached to the server. The storage is dedicated to a single server and is not sharable among multiple servers. Data stored on a Storage area network (SAN) and network-attached storage (NAS) architectures can be shared among several server applications.[31]

References

  1. ^ Davis, Jessica. "Pivot3 Offers Converged Storage Platform to Data Protection Market," ChannelInsider, September 30, 2010. [1]
  2. ^ Wexler, Steve."Nutanix: Time To Ban The SAN," Network Computing, August 16, 2011 [2]
  3. ^ Jedras, Jeff. “Data centre model ‘broken,’ HP says,” June 7, 2011, IT World Canada (See the text about MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas for how converged storage improves application performance and delivery).[3]
  4. ^ Talbot, Chris, “HP Adds to Converged Infrastructure Lineup,” June 7, 2011, ChannelInsider [4]
  5. ^ Madden, Brian."Did Nutanix just create the ultimate server/storage big data combo hardware for VDI?" [5]
  6. ^ TechTarget, "Unraveling the secrets of converged storage networks," page 6, February 2011 [6]
  7. ^ Baburajan, Rajani. "The Rising Cloud Storage Market Opportunity Strengthens Vendors," TMCnet, August 24,2011[7]
  8. ^ Floyer, David. "HP Converged Storage Sets the Stage for the Next Era of Computing", August 15, 2011, Wikibon [8]
  9. ^ Wexler, Steve. "Nutanix: Time To Ban The SAN", August 16. 2011, Network Computing[9]
  10. ^ Grayson, Ian. "Heat is on in search for perfect host as growth creates storage challenge," August 23, 2011, The Australian [10]
  11. ^ Burt, Jeffrey. "Cisco Surprise In x86 Blade Server Top Five, IDC Says," May 26, 2011, eWeek Europe [11]
  12. ^ Asaro, Tony. "The impact of virtual storage appliances," SearchStorage.com[http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/magazineContent/The-impact-of-virtual-storage-appliances.
  13. ^ SearchStorage.com, "What is virtual SAN appliance (VSA)"[12]
  14. ^ Garret, Brian. "ESG Lab Review: HP P4000 SAN: Affordable, Scalable, Reliable Storage," March 25, 2010, Enterprise Strategy Group [13]
  15. ^ Orenstein, Gary. "VMware’s slow and steady attack on storage," GigaOm, August 27, 2011[14]
  16. ^ Hess, Ken. "Do you need a private cloud?" ZDNet, August 21, 2011 [15]
  17. ^ Bernier, Paula. "Telcos Continue to Buy Into the Cloud," TMCnet, May 1. 2011 [16]
  18. ^ Mark Peters, Briefs: Scale-out Storage, Enterprise Strategy Group [17]
  19. ^ Gary Orenstein, "Doubling Down on Scale-out Storage", GigaOm, April 10, 2010 [18]
  20. ^ Mellor, Chris. "HP P10000 storage array more and less than expected," August 23, 2011, The Register [19]
  21. ^ Mark Peters, Briefs: Scale-out Storage, Enterprise Strategy Group [20]
  22. ^ Gary Orenstein, "Doubling Down on Scale-out Storage", GigaOm, April 10, 2010 [21]
  23. ^ Mark Peters, Briefs: Scale-out Storage, Enterprise Strategy Group [22]
  24. ^ Mellor, Chris. "HP P10000 storage array more and less than expected," August 23, 2011, The Register [23]
  25. ^ Vellante, David. "Virtualizing Globally Federated Cache Coherent Storage for the Cloud," March 12, 2010, Wikibon [24]
  26. ^ Linthicum, David. "Face the facts: Cloud performance isn't always stable," August 18, 2011, InfoWorld [25]
  27. ^ Violino, Bob. "HP Unveils Storage Software For Cloud, Virtualized Environments," August 23, 2011, Information Management [26]
  28. ^ Tay, Liz. "Hitachi ditches monolithic storage," September 27, 2010, IT News [27]
  29. ^ Evans, Chris. "Choosing Between Monolithic and Modular Architectures – Part I," August 24, 2011, Sys-Con Media [28]
  30. ^ SearchStorage.com definition of unified storage (network unified storage or NUS) [29]
  31. ^ Mellor, Chris. "Direct-attached storage vs SAN: Clustered DAS model gaining favor in virtualised, solid-state world?," SearchStorage.co.uk [30]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Converged_storage&oldid=456227218"