East Germany–Soviet Union relations: Difference between revisions
Superzohar (talk | contribs) m →History |
Superzohar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==Military relations== |
==Military relations== |
||
The East German political and military leaders had never come to terms with the arrangement from the 1950s of an army without a General Staff (Generalstab) but a Main Staff instead (Hauptstab). With international recognition in the 1970s, the GDR expected to be treated like the other national Warsaw Pact armies and to be granted a Generalstab. Even the Soviet Union had imported this traditional German term into Russian language as a designation for its own army’s General Staff. Twice the GDR leadership approached the USSR in this respect, and twice it was rebuffed with the Soviet argument that the West German army also lacked a Generalstab.<ref>PHP Archive, unpublished interview with General Fritz Streletz, Strausberg, 27 January 2003</ref> |
|||
By 1963, a moderate expansion of the NVA after a period of relative contraction culminated in the participation of the NVA in the joint Soviet-East German-Polish-Czechoslovak exercise "Quartet" which had for the first time an East German gerneral as its commander.<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> On November 13, 1964 the first long range plan was reportedly developed for "consolidation" of cooperation and "comradeship-in-arms" betwen the Nva and the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]].<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> Due to the fact that border units were also assigned the critical mission of protecting important areas from breakthrouh attacks by the enemy into East Germany teritory, the cooperation between the border forces in East Germany and the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]] significantly expanded. Of the thirty-two major installations which were erected along the inter-German border as part of the East German zonal complex for air space surveillance and early warning, the majority were placed under the permanent control of the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]] for use in electronic disruption and deception measures.<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> |
By 1963, a moderate expansion of the NVA after a period of relative contraction culminated in the participation of the NVA in the joint Soviet-East German-Polish-Czechoslovak exercise "Quartet" which had for the first time an East German gerneral as its commander.<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> On November 13, 1964 the first long range plan was reportedly developed for "consolidation" of cooperation and "comradeship-in-arms" betwen the Nva and the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]].<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> Due to the fact that border units were also assigned the critical mission of protecting important areas from breakthrouh attacks by the enemy into East Germany teritory, the cooperation between the border forces in East Germany and the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]] significantly expanded. Of the thirty-two major installations which were erected along the inter-German border as part of the East German zonal complex for air space surveillance and early warning, the majority were placed under the permanent control of the [[Group of Soviet Forces in Germany]] for use in electronic disruption and deception measures.<ref>Soviet-East German Military Alliance</ref> |
||
Revision as of 15:44, 21 October 2011
Throuout their existence East Germany and the Soviet Union maintained closed diplomatic relations. The Soviet Union was the chief economic and political sponsor of East Germany.
History
In 1964, Mikoyan's 10-12 March trip to East Berlin, ostensibly to celebrate the 70th birthday of inacaive Premier Grotewohl, was particularly curious in light of the fact- that no other bloc dignitaries of Mikoyan's rank attended. Mikoyan's appearance seemed to represent a Soviet effort to assuage East German fears on certain economic and military points of disagreement.[1]
In 1963 the 13 June Soviet-GDR joint communique recorded Ulbricht's praise for ghrushchev's policy of "mutual example" in a manner that could be read as giving approval in principal to further Soviet efforts in that vein, including a reduction in the Soviet forces in East Germany.[2]
Brezhnev era
On the day Khrushchev left for his vacation, GDR Prime Minister Willi Stoph made a sudden visit to Moscow and commenced an intensive three-day series of On the day Khrushchev left for his vacation, GDR leader Willi Stoph.made a sudden visit to Moscow and commenced an intensive three-day series of talks with Kosygin and other high-level Kremlin leaders. The timing of Stoph's visit, ostensibly for the purpose of opening an exhibit devoted to the 15th anniversary of the GDR.
Then in rapid succession, Suslov and Brezhnev came forward with strong statements reassuring the East German leaders about Soviet intentions toward Gerplany. Suslov made aflat no-sell-out pledge in Moscow on the same day (5 October) that Brezhnev was welcomed in East Berlin by Ulbricht, who had refused to greet Khrushchev's son-in law two months earlier. Ulbricht on 6 October responded with a rather defiant lecture on the limits of Soviet interference In GDR sovereignty. And at the same podium Brezhnev promised that there would be no "behind-the-back" deals detrimental to GDR interests.[3]
Mikhail Suslov, in his 5 October speech at a Kremlin meeting devoted to the GDR anniversary went out of his way to deny the possibility of a Bonn-Moscow deal at the expense of the GDR's "sovereignty" Suslov voiced the flat "guarantee" that "even if all the gold in the world were offered, the relations between Moscow and East Berlin would still not be for sale.
The initial GDR reaction to Khrushchev's ouster and its treatment of the sell-out question was ambivalent. On the one hand, there was evidence to suggest that Khruschev's removal brought quick relief to the leaders in East Berlin about the fate of East Germany's future. The GDR's first official reaction to the Kremlin coup, which was registered in the 17 October communique of the SED Central Committee--the first Eastern European party statement on the Khrushchev ouster--was that the friendship treaty of June 1964 will be carried out "honorably" implying, perhaps, that there was some question among the East German leaders as to whether it would have been honorably implemented prior to Khrushchev's ouster.
The new leadership may have felt that other more pressing domestic and foreign matters demanded their initial concentration and that any major diplomatic action such as the Bonn visit--on the German question should be postponed. Concentration on other foreign and domestic matters may also explain, in part, Moscow's dropping of any element of urgency in the new Soviet peace treaty line . East German displeasure over the Soviet shelving of the peace treaty-West Berlin Issues may have accounted, in part, for the surprisingly low-key treatgent given by the GDR to Kosygin's 27 February-2 March 1965 visit to East Germany to take in the annual Leipzig trade fair.
Military relations
The East German political and military leaders had never come to terms with the arrangement from the 1950s of an army without a General Staff (Generalstab) but a Main Staff instead (Hauptstab). With international recognition in the 1970s, the GDR expected to be treated like the other national Warsaw Pact armies and to be granted a Generalstab. Even the Soviet Union had imported this traditional German term into Russian language as a designation for its own army’s General Staff. Twice the GDR leadership approached the USSR in this respect, and twice it was rebuffed with the Soviet argument that the West German army also lacked a Generalstab.[4]
By 1963, a moderate expansion of the NVA after a period of relative contraction culminated in the participation of the NVA in the joint Soviet-East German-Polish-Czechoslovak exercise "Quartet" which had for the first time an East German gerneral as its commander.[5] On November 13, 1964 the first long range plan was reportedly developed for "consolidation" of cooperation and "comradeship-in-arms" betwen the Nva and the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany.[6] Due to the fact that border units were also assigned the critical mission of protecting important areas from breakthrouh attacks by the enemy into East Germany teritory, the cooperation between the border forces in East Germany and the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany significantly expanded. Of the thirty-two major installations which were erected along the inter-German border as part of the East German zonal complex for air space surveillance and early warning, the majority were placed under the permanent control of the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany for use in electronic disruption and deception measures.[7]
References
- ^ Strains in Soviet-East German relations: 1962-1967
- ^ Strains in Soviet-East German relations: 1962-1967
- ^ Strains in Soviet-East German relations: 1962-1967
- ^ PHP Archive, unpublished interview with General Fritz Streletz, Strausberg, 27 January 2003
- ^ Soviet-East German Military Alliance
- ^ Soviet-East German Military Alliance
- ^ Soviet-East German Military Alliance