User:Nikasho/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:14, 24 October 2011

This is the user sandbox of Nikasho. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Template:WAP assignment

Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act (MITA), Bill-C74 was first introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on November, 15, 2005 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=2093061&Language=E&Mode=1&View=7). Introduced as a part of a package of “Lawful Access” proposals, MITA if passed, would require telephone and internet service providers to design, create and maintain interception capabilities into existing networks and into new technologies as they are introduced into Canada. Second, it would allow law enforcement to compel telephone and internet service providers to disclose subscriber information without a warrant.

“Lawful Access” provisions for interception of communications already exist in Canada under the Criminal Code Act, first adopted in 1974 (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). The Criminal Code was amended in the 1980s and again in the 1990’s to allow law enforcement the ability to search and cease computer systems (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). In 1984 the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act was passed by Parliament giving law enforcement the right to lawfully intercept private communication in defense of national security (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). Supporters of MITA and other “Lawful Access” legislation, being proposed to date, believe the passage of these bills will bring much needed updates to existing “Lawful Access” legislation to support [law enforcement investigative techniques to keep pace with technological advancement and its changes(http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2005/11/15/surveillance051114.html).

Critics have raised concerns including:

• 2 existing points

The dissolution of Parliament on November 28th, 2005, and ended all bills introduced during the 38th Parliament by the, then Liberal government, including MITA Bill C-74 (http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/prime_ministers/clips/13118/).

Private Member’s Bill C-416 and C-285

Liberal MP Marlene Jennings re-introduced MITA as Private Member’s Bill C-416 in March, 2007 and again in February of 2009, as Private Member`s Bill C-285 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=3627149&Language=E&Mode=1&View=3). In both instances, MITA only received one reading before new elections were called, ending the review process of this bill.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:Canada Education Program/Courses/Knowledge and Information in Society (Andrew Clement and Siobhan Stevenson) | university = University of Toronto | term = 2011 Fall | project = WikiProject Wikipedia }}
+Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act (MITA), Bill-C74 was first introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on November, 15, 2005 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=2093061&Language=E&Mode=1&View=7). Introduced as a part of a package of “Lawful Access” proposals, MITA if passed, would require telephone and internet service providers to design, create and maintain interception capabilities into existing networks and into new technologies as they are introduced into Canada. Second, it would allow law enforcement to compel telephone and internet service providers to disclose subscriber information without a warrant.
-===Bill C-46===
-On June 18, 2009, Bill-C46 (Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act) was introduced during the second session of parliament<ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Mode=1&billId=3997477&Language=E |title=House of Government Bill C-46 (40-2)|publisher=Parliment of Canada}}</ref>. This bill made it through to second reading before it died on the table with the prorogation of Parliment, December 30th, 2009<ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.economist.com/node/15211862?story_id=15211862&source=hptextfeature |title=Canada Without Parliament: Halted in mid-debate |publisher=The Economist}}</ref>.
+“Lawful Access” provisions for interception of communications already exist in Canada under the Criminal Code Act, first adopted in 1974 (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). The Criminal Code was amended in the 1980s and again in the 1990’s to allow law enforcement the ability to search and cease computer systems (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). In 1984 the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act was passed by Parliament giving law enforcement the right to lawfully intercept private communication in defense of national security (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). Supporters of MITA and other “Lawful Access” legislation, being proposed to date, believe the passage of these bills will bring much needed updates to existing “Lawful Access” legislation to support [law enforcement investigative techniques to keep pace with technological advancement and its changes(http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2005/11/15/surveillance051114.html).
-===Bill C-52===
+Critics have raised concerns including:
+•	2 existing points
+The dissolution of Parliament on November 28th, 2005, and ended all bills introduced during the 38th Parliament by the, then Liberal government, including MITA Bill C-74 (http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/prime_ministers/clips/13118/).
+===Private Member’s Bill C-416 and C-285===
+Liberal MP Marlene Jennings re-introduced MITA as Private Member’s Bill C-416  in March, 2007 and again in February of 2009, as Private Member`s Bill C-285 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=3627149&Language=E&Mode=1&View=3). In both instances, MITA only received one reading before new elections were called, ending the review process of this bill.
 ===References===
 <references />
+*http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=2093061&Language=E&Mode=1&View=7
+*http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Mode=1&billId=3997477&Language=E
+*http://www.economist.com/node/15211862?story_id=15211862&source=hptextfeature
+*http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html
+*http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2005/11/15/surveillance051114.html
+*http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/prime_ministers/clips/13118/
+*http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=3627149&Language=E&Mode=1&View=3