User:Nikasho/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:31, 24 October 2011

This is the user sandbox of Nikasho. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Template:WAP assignment

Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act (MITA), Bill-C74 was first introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on November, 15, 2005 ^[1]. Introduced as a part of a package of “Lawful Access” proposals, MITA if passed, would require telephone and internet service providers to design, create and maintain interception capabilities into existing networks and into new technologies as they are introduced into Canada. Second, it would allow law enforcement to compel telephone and internet service providers to disclose subscriber information without a warrant. ^[1].

“Lawful Access” provisions for interception of communications already exist in Canada under the Criminal Code Act, first adopted in 1974 ^[1]. The Criminal Code was amended in the 1980s and again in the 1990’s to allow law enforcement the ability to search and cease computer systems ^[1]. In 1984 the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act was passed by Parliament giving law enforcement the right to lawfully intercept private communication in defense of national security ^[1]. Supporters of MITA and other “Lawful Access” legislation, being proposed to date, believe the passage of these bills will bring much needed updates to existing “Lawful Access” legislation to support [law enforcement investigative techniques to keep pace with technological advancement and its changes^[1] Critics have raised concerns including:

• 2 existing points

The dissolution of Parliament on November 28th, 2005, and ended all bills introduced during the 38th Parliament by the, then Liberal government, including MITA Bill C-74 (http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/prime_ministers/clips/13118/).

Private Member’s Bill C-416 and C-285

Liberal MP Marlene Jennings re-introduced MITA as Private Member’s Bill C-416 in March, 2007 and again in February of 2009, as Private Member`s Bill C-285 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=3627149&Language=E&Mode=1&View=3). In both instances, MITA only received one reading before new elections were called, ending the review process of this bill.

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f "House of Government Bill C-46 (40-2)". Parliment of Canada. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help); Unknown parameter |http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Mode= ignored (help) Cite error: The named reference "WikiMarkup" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

[WikiMarkup-1] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f "House of Government Bill C-46 (40-2)". Parliment of Canada. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help); Unknown parameter |http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Mode= ignored (help) Cite error: The named reference "WikiMarkup" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).

[1]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:Canada Education Program/Courses/Knowledge and Information in Society (Andrew Clement and Siobhan Stevenson) | university = University of Toronto | term = 2011 Fall | project = WikiProject Wikipedia }}
-Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act (MITA), Bill-C74 was first introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on November, 15, 2005 (http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?billId=2093061&Language=E&Mode=1&View=7). Introduced as a part of a package of “Lawful Access” proposals, MITA if passed, would require telephone and internet service providers to design, create and maintain interception capabilities into existing networks and into new technologies as they are introduced into Canada. Second, it would allow law enforcement to compel telephone and internet service providers to disclose subscriber information without a warrant.
+Modernization of Investigative Techniques Act (MITA), Bill-C74 was first introduced in the Canadian House of Commons on November, 15, 2005 <ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.parl.gc.ca/LegisInfo/BillDetails.aspx?Mode=1&billId=3997477&Language=E |title=House of Government Bill C-46 (40-2)|publisher=Parliment of Canada}}</ref>. Introduced as a part of a package of “Lawful Access” proposals, MITA if passed, would require telephone and internet service providers to design, create and maintain interception capabilities into existing networks and into new technologies as they are introduced into Canada. Second, it would allow law enforcement to compel telephone and internet service providers to disclose subscriber information without a warrant. <ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1009/125/|title=The Lawful Access Spin|publisher=Michael Geist}}</ref>.
-“Lawful Access” provisions for interception of communications already exist in Canada under the Criminal Code Act, first adopted in 1974 (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). The Criminal Code was amended in the 1980s and again in the 1990’s to allow law enforcement the ability to search and cease computer systems (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). In 1984 the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act was passed by Parliament giving law enforcement the right to lawfully intercept private communication in defense of national security (http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html). Supporters of MITA and other “Lawful Access” legislation, being proposed to date, believe the passage of these bills will bring much needed updates to existing “Lawful Access” legislation to support [law enforcement investigative techniques to keep pace with technological advancement and its changes(http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2005/11/15/surveillance051114.html).
+“Lawful Access” provisions for interception of communications already exist in Canada under the Criminal Code Act, first adopted in 1974 <ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html|title=Lawful Access FAQ|publisher=Department of Justice Canada}}</ref>. The Criminal Code was amended in the 1980s and again in the 1990’s to allow law enforcement the ability to search and cease computer systems <ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html|title=Lawful Access FAQ|publisher=Department of Justice Canada}}</ref>. In 1984 the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) Act was passed by Parliament giving law enforcement the right to lawfully intercept private communication in defense of national security <ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cons/la-al/sum-res/faq.html|title=Lawful Access FAQ|publisher=Department of Justice Canada}}</ref>. Supporters of MITA and other “Lawful Access” legislation, being proposed to date, believe the passage of these bills will bring much needed updates to existing “Lawful Access” legislation to support [law enforcement investigative techniques to keep pace with technological advancement and its changes<ref name="WikiMarkup">{{cite web |http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2005/11/15/surveillance051114.html|title=New surveillance bill introduced|publisher= CBC/Radio Canada}}</ref>
 Critics have raised concerns including: