Talk:Air Napier: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:52, 25 October 2011

	Aviation portal This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This redirect is supported by the airline project.

New Zealand Redirect‑class Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

PROD

Delete - Fails WP:NOT, I concur with proposer.Petebutt (talk) 10:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that you've linked to WP:What Wikipedia is not? Unscintillating (talk) 04:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look notable. It must have been written by the company itself - 2 notes are pointless - one is a list of licensed NZ air carriers, with partial addresses, and another a company listing on a site that notes the details and existence of corporations. The third source mentions them once at the very end, in a sentence that isn't even completely about them, indicating they started a rival service in a Navajo. The lengths some folks will go for advertising.NiD.29 (talk) 23:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the site [1] is the official New Zealand companies register, it's an extremely reliable source, but not useful for the purposes of proving notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 23:43, 25 October 2011 edit NiD.29 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Page movers 28,553 edits →PROD: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:52, 25 October 2011 edit undo Stuartyeates (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 73,204 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Doesn't look notable. It must have been written by the company itself - 2 notes are pointless - one is a list of licensed NZ air carriers, with partial addresses, and another a company listing on a site that notes the details and existence of corporations. The third source mentions them once at the very end, in a sentence that isn't even completely about them, indicating they started a rival service in a Navajo. The lengths some folks will go for advertising.[[User:NiD.29\|NiD.29]] ([[User talk:NiD.29\|talk]]) 23:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)		::Doesn't look notable. It must have been written by the company itself - 2 notes are pointless - one is a list of licensed NZ air carriers, with partial addresses, and another a company listing on a site that notes the details and existence of corporations. The third source mentions them once at the very end, in a sentence that isn't even completely about them, indicating they started a rival service in a Navajo. The lengths some folks will go for advertising.[[User:NiD.29\|NiD.29]] ([[User talk:NiD.29\|talk]]) 23:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
			:::Note that the site [http://www.business.govt.nz/companies/] is the official New Zealand companies register, it's an extremely reliable source, but not useful for the purposes of proving notability. [[User:Stuartyeates\|Stuartyeates]] ([[User talk:Stuartyeates\|talk]]) 23:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)