User talk:Racconish

Vanity

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		Thank you! Codrin.B (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For rescuing the articles you wrote from speedy deletion. I dream of horses @ 17:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND ARTICLE

Sorry, but with WMC's entry this Purpose article may be Wikipedia:BATTLEGROUND ARTICLE now. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

New proposition made on article's talk page. Cheers, Racconish ^Tk 08:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

?

I find this baffling. Instead of wasting time wronging rights and pointing fingers, perhaps use of new information in the latest article would improve the overall standards of wikipedia. Surely and experienced editor such as yourself would realize this. I find it absurd that you should delete my contributions, which as far as I see, have corrected and made the article more accurate. You even deleted an obvious correction of the spelling. If you genuinely have your interests set on improving the page, you should use your time to use information in the latest article and add to the page, not remove contributions by other editors, who may not have your experience, but may know more about the subject.

TY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Southpole1 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

I have added 5 references to the source you provided, which does not establish The Economist was wrong in calling Chamsi-Pasha a former textile agent. Please discuss matters related to the article on the article's talk page. Racconish ^Tk 12:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Do not threaten. All editors are equal and you are no exception to the rules of wikipedia. All you said applies to you as well, do not lecture other members about rules you clearly do not abide by and do not delete messages you are ashamed of, which accuse you of bias.

TY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Southpole1 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I am not threatening but warning you. Vandalizing or Edit warring are not appropriate responses. And I did not delete your messages on Moxon but move them to the article's talk page where they belong. Racconish ^Tk 16:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

I find it unusual for you to suggest being attacked. The fact is you must see things from somebody else's perspective otherwise it will be viewed a inconsiderate. The article is where I call 'middle ground' now, until further material which would enhance the quality of the page emerges. Thank you, hopefully in future we collaborate on issues not oppose one another.

Southpole1 (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Racconish! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)