Jump to content

Talk:Metallica: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Timeline deletion suggestion
Line 150: Line 150:


:It would be if there was constant emphasis, but in normal speech the first "a" (Met'''''a'''''llica) is given more emphasis than the other one (Metallic'''''a'''''). In cases such as this, the lack of emphasis closes the mouth a little, so a different sound is produced: {{IPA|ə}}, which is something like "uh". Incidentally, this is the same sound difference betweens the "a"s as in the word "alpha", and so by extension my username. Of course, while both these instances apply to standard pronunciations (in this case in both American and British English), they may not apply to certain regional accents. <font face="sans-serif">'''[[user:Alphathon|<font color="#900">Alphathon</font>]]'''&nbsp;<span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">/'æɫfə.θɒn/</span>&nbsp;<small><sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<font color="#900">talk</font>]])</sup></small></font> 00:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
:It would be if there was constant emphasis, but in normal speech the first "a" (Met'''''a'''''llica) is given more emphasis than the other one (Metallic'''''a'''''). In cases such as this, the lack of emphasis closes the mouth a little, so a different sound is produced: {{IPA|ə}}, which is something like "uh". Incidentally, this is the same sound difference betweens the "a"s as in the word "alpha", and so by extension my username. Of course, while both these instances apply to standard pronunciations (in this case in both American and British English), they may not apply to certain regional accents. <font face="sans-serif">'''[[user:Alphathon|<font color="#900">Alphathon</font>]]'''&nbsp;<span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">/'æɫfə.θɒn/</span>&nbsp;<small><sup>([[user talk:Alphathon|<font color="#900">talk</font>]])</sup></small></font> 00:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

== Timeline ==
I think the timeline chart is useless. Does the length of the membership of each band member need to be depicted by a chart taking half of the screen? There has not been that many changes in the line-up expect for the very early days, so I suggest the chart to be deleted. [[User:Michal Stankoviansky|Michal Stankoviansky]] ([[User talk:Michal Stankoviansky|talk]]) 08:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:51, 28 October 2011

Featured articleMetallica is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 1, 2008.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 25, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
November 23, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 11, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2007Good article nomineeListed
January 5, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
January 8, 2009Featured topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Featured article

Edit request from Yennik100, 30 August 2011

The third reference at the bottom of this page links to an article mentioning Metallica's 5th straight number one album. In the reference, the world "straight" is misspelled as "streight."

Yennik100 (talk) 20:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 DoneBility (talk) 21:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Style and Influence

Sex Pistols are listed as an influence here. I have been a Metallica fan for 15 years and have never once heard any Metallica member or journalist refer to the Sex Pistols as one of Metallica's influences in any way. I'm not taking anything away from the Sex Pistols, who I respect to a certain degree. But to say they were an influence on Metallica is, as far as I know, completely unfounded. Somebody please agree and rectify this! 119.12.192.82 (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.192.82 (talk) 11:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hetfield is the only member I know of that even likes the Sex Pistols at all. I know that Ulrich does not like them, and I am not sure about the other members. But just because Hetfield likes them does not make them an influence to Metallica. Though I have heard of them, Ulrich in particular (I am not sure about the other members), being influenced by The Clash. So maybe The Clash should be added to the influences. Though this should be discussed before adding it. --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest Artists

Didn't see it mentioned in the article, but i didnt check the archives to see if this has been brought up. Anyways, [1]Jasper420 05:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quote in the Lulu and future events section

In the Lulu and future events section, the quote from Trujillo seems to have a typo in the part "And it's only gonna better." It seems like it should be "And it's only gonna get better." But I thought that I should discuss it before changing it. --BLAguyMONKEY! (talk) 08:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Table for releases

This article is locked from being edited any further so I was wondering if someone who can edit this article could include this table I wrote out for the releases. It doesn't include Lulu, since that album is not an official studio album by Metallica. Here's the full table I made

Date of Release Title Billboard peak RIAA cert. Label
July 25, 1983 Kill 'Em All 120 3× Platinum Megaforce
July 27, 1984 Ride the Lightning 100 5× Platinum
March 3, 1986 Master of Puppets 29 6× Platinum Elektra
August 25, 1988 …And Justice for All 6 8× Platinum
August 13, 1991 Metallica 1 15× Platinum
June 4, 1996 Load 1 5x Platinum
November 18, 1997 ReLoad 1 4x Platinum
June 5, 2003 St. Anger 1 2x Platinum
September 12, 2008 Death Magnetic 1 2× Platinum Warner Bros.

Pronunciation

The article states that the pronunciation of the name Metallica is as follows: məˈtælɨkə/ But shouldn't it be məˈtælɨkæ/, instead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oulipal (talkcontribs) 22:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It would be if there was constant emphasis, but in normal speech the first "a" (Metallica) is given more emphasis than the other one (Metallica). In cases such as this, the lack of emphasis closes the mouth a little, so a different sound is produced: ə, which is something like "uh". Incidentally, this is the same sound difference betweens the "a"s as in the word "alpha", and so by extension my username. Of course, while both these instances apply to standard pronunciations (in this case in both American and British English), they may not apply to certain regional accents. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 00:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline

I think the timeline chart is useless. Does the length of the membership of each band member need to be depicted by a chart taking half of the screen? There has not been that many changes in the line-up expect for the very early days, so I suggest the chart to be deleted. Michal Stankoviansky (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]