Jump to content

Snubnose darter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hjohns14 (talk | contribs)
Hjohns14 (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:


== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
The following is a proposed conservation management plan for the snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum''. Two subspecies are recognized including the Cumberland snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum atripinne'' and the Tennessee snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum simoterum''. The historical and current range of ''E. simoterum atripinne'' includes the Lower Tennessee River drainage unit and the Cumberland River drainage unit. The historical range of ''E. simoterum simoterum'' includes the Lower and Upper Tennessee River units, and it has been introduced into both the Licking Big Sandy Creek river unit and the Kanawha-New-Guyandotte-Little Kanawha River unit. Intergradation between the two subspecies occurs in the Lower Tennessee River unit. The mean standard length of ''Etheostoma simoterum'' is 45 mm, the reported clutch size is 152, and the maximum age is 1 year. The snubnose darter inhabits riffles and rock-bottomed pools in streams with low turbidity. As of 2000, ''Etheostoma simoterum'' was listed as currently stable, meaning that it is widespread and not in need of any immediate conservation action.
The following is a proposed conservation management plan for the snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum''. Two subspecies are recognized including the Cumberland snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum atripinne'' and the Tennessee snubnose darter ''Etheostoma simoterum simoterum''.<ref name="ref1"> The historical and current range of ''E. simoterum atripinne'' includes the Lower Tennessee River drainage unit and the Cumberland River drainage unit. The historical range of ''E. simoterum simoterum'' includes the Lower and Upper Tennessee River units, and it has been introduced into both the Licking Big Sandy Creek river unit and the Kanawha-New-Guyandotte-Little Kanawha River unit. Intergradation between the two subspecies occurs in the Lower Tennessee River unit. The mean standard length of ''Etheostoma simoterum'' is 45 mm, the reported clutch size is 152, and the maximum age is 1 year. The snubnose darter inhabits riffles and rock-bottomed pools in streams with low turbidity. As of 2000, ''Etheostoma simoterum'' was listed as currently stable, meaning that it is widespread and not in need of any immediate conservation action.

==References==
==References==
*http://www.bio.utk.edu/hulseylab/Fishlist.html
*http://www.bio.utk.edu/hulseylab/Fishlist.html

Revision as of 13:56, 1 November 2011

Snubnose darter
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Class:
Order:
Family:
Genus:
Species:
E. simoterum
Binomial name
Etheostoma simoterum
(Cope, 1868)

The common name of Etheostoma simoterum is the snubnose darter. It is one of the 324 fish species found in Tennessee.

Introduction

The following is a proposed conservation management plan for the snubnose darter Etheostoma simoterum. Two subspecies are recognized including the Cumberland snubnose darter Etheostoma simoterum atripinne and the Tennessee snubnose darter Etheostoma simoterum simoterum.<ref name="ref1"> The historical and current range of E. simoterum atripinne includes the Lower Tennessee River drainage unit and the Cumberland River drainage unit. The historical range of E. simoterum simoterum includes the Lower and Upper Tennessee River units, and it has been introduced into both the Licking Big Sandy Creek river unit and the Kanawha-New-Guyandotte-Little Kanawha River unit. Intergradation between the two subspecies occurs in the Lower Tennessee River unit. The mean standard length of Etheostoma simoterum is 45 mm, the reported clutch size is 152, and the maximum age is 1 year. The snubnose darter inhabits riffles and rock-bottomed pools in streams with low turbidity. As of 2000, Etheostoma simoterum was listed as currently stable, meaning that it is widespread and not in need of any immediate conservation action.

References

  • http://www.bio.utk.edu/hulseylab/Fishlist.html
  • Clabaugh, Jerod P., K. Emily Knott, Robert M. Wood, and Richard L. Mayden. 1996. Systematics and Biogeography of Snubnose Darters, Genus Etheostoma (Teleostei: Percidae) from the Black Warrior River System, Alabama. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 119-134.
  • Greenberg, Larry A. 1988. Interactive Segregation between the Stream Fishes Etheostoma simoterum and E. rufilinatum. Oikos 51: 193-202.
  • Heins, David C. 2001. Variation in Clutch Size and Ovum Size of the Snubnose Darter, Etheostoma simoterum (Cope), from Two Populations in Tennessee. The American Midland Naturalist 145: 74-79.
  • Jones, Jess W. 2010. Life History and Demographics of the Endangered Birdwing Pearlymussel (Lemiox rimosus) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). The American Midland Naturalist 163: 335-350.
  • Jones, Jess W., and Richard J. Neves. 2002. Life History and Propagation of the Endangered Fanshell Pearlymussel, Cyprogenia stegaria Rafinesque (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 76-88.
  • Jones, Jess W., Richard J. Neves, Steven A. Ahlstedt, and Rachel A. Mair. 2004. Life history and propagation of the endangered dromedary pearlymussel (Dromus dromas) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 23: 515-525.
  • Paine, M.D. 1990. Life history tactics of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatiini) and their relationship with body size, reproductive behaviour, latitude and rarity. Journal of Fish Biology 37: 473-488.
  • Rogers, Susan O., Brian T. Watson, Richard J. Neves. 2001. Life History and Population Biology of the Endangered Tan Riffleshell (Epioblasma florentina walkeri) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 582-594.
  • Warren, Melvin L., Brooks M. Burr, Stephen J. Walsh, Henry L. Bart, Jr., Robert C. Cashner, David A. Etnier, Byron J. Freeman, Bernard R Kuhajda, Richard L. Mayden, Henry W. Robison, Stephen T. Ross, and Wayne C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States. Fisheries 25: 7-31.