Talk:Risk of Missed PRRS PCR Detection: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:30, 5 November 2011

Under Hazard to detection, did you mean for the indentation to occur that way or was that by accident? -Vic 570vca (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and removed the bullet points and added arrows and spaces instead to try to make it a bit more readable. However, I'm not sure I'm happy with how it turned out. Since you said you wanted a flow chart type effect, and since there appears to be only one line of succession in the "flowchart", would just a numbered list would be better?? Let me know what you think. -Vic 570vca (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a little info on the implications of PRRS would be helpful in the opening paragraph. Also, I really liked your pathway format. Do you mind if I borrow your idea. - Dan (570ddt (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Revision as of 13:06, 4 November 2011 edit 570vca (talk \| contribs) 58 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:30, 5 November 2011 edit undo 570ddt (talk \| contribs) 94 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I went ahead and removed the bullet points and added arrows and spaces instead to try to make it a bit more readable. However, I'm not sure I'm happy with how it turned out. Since you said you wanted a flow chart type effect, and since there appears to be only one line of succession in the "flowchart", would just a numbered list would be better?? Let me know what you think. -Vic [[User:570vca\|570vca]] ([[User talk:570vca\|talk]]) 13:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)		I went ahead and removed the bullet points and added arrows and spaces instead to try to make it a bit more readable. However, I'm not sure I'm happy with how it turned out. Since you said you wanted a flow chart type effect, and since there appears to be only one line of succession in the "flowchart", would just a numbered list would be better?? Let me know what you think. -Vic [[User:570vca\|570vca]] ([[User talk:570vca\|talk]]) 13:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

			Maybe a little info on the implications of PRRS would be helpful in the opening paragraph. Also, I really liked your pathway format. Do you mind if I borrow your idea. - Dan ([[User:570ddt\|570ddt]] ([[User talk:570ddt\|talk]]) 01:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC))