Talk:Hazard (risk): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Good idea. Thanks -Vic [[User:570vca|570vca]] ([[User talk:570vca|talk]]) 20:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC) |
Good idea. Thanks -Vic [[User:570vca|570vca]] ([[User talk:570vca|talk]]) 20:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
Hi Vic, my only concern so far is why you'd add 'vaccine' as a hazard among all the possible examples? Maybe there is good reason you chose it but I'd suggest replacing with something more likely to cause harm. Just a suggestion - Wayne (user: 570wac) |
|||
Revision as of 22:46, 7 November 2011
Vic, I would appreciate your help with my references (carol: 570:cjk). I added an example to illustrate that the hazards of chemicals are dose-dependent. Remove it if you don't like it.
The example for chemical hazards was a good idea. I edited it a bit to make it more clear. -Vic. 570vca (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Vic! I like the information and how you presented it. If I could make one recommendation, it would be on the Hazard Identification section. There is information on how Biological and Chemical hazards are regulated (corollary of how risk is mitigated), but none for Physical and Mechanical. I would recommend adding an example using NOAA, DOT, Consumer Protection, etc. 570mpp (talk) 00:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Good idea. Thanks -Vic 570vca (talk) 20:18, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Vic, my only concern so far is why you'd add 'vaccine' as a hazard among all the possible examples? Maybe there is good reason you chose it but I'd suggest replacing with something more likely to cause harm. Just a suggestion - Wayne (user: 570wac)