Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Snowded/GoodNight: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Delete |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Delete''' The user can ask for a willing admin to email them the contents, if they want. Such a page has no place anywhere on Wikipedia. [[User:Wctaiwan|wctaiwan]] ([[User talk:Wctaiwan|talk]]) 06:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' The user can ask for a willing admin to email them the contents, if they want. Such a page has no place anywhere on Wikipedia. [[User:Wctaiwan|wctaiwan]] ([[User talk:Wctaiwan|talk]]) 06:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. This could easily be kept off-wiki, and if an RfC/U is to be filed against a currently active editor in good standing, it needs to be done already. Like, ''yesterday''. [[User:Doc9871|<font color="#000000" size="2">'''Doc'''</font>]] [[User_talk:Doc9871|<font color="#999999">'''talk'''</font>]] 06:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:23, 11 November 2011
This is at worst an attack page and at best something that can be handled on a personal machine. If there is enough evidence to start the page then there is enough evidence to start the discussion. Now that this page is at ANI it has become counterproductive. Before then there might be some reason but now we have drama. Time to remove it. Cptnono (talk) 05:40, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The user can ask for a willing admin to email them the contents, if they want. Such a page has no place anywhere on Wikipedia. wctaiwan (talk) 06:07, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This could easily be kept off-wiki, and if an RfC/U is to be filed against a currently active editor in good standing, it needs to be done already. Like, yesterday. Doc talk 06:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)