User talk:Olesachem: Difference between revisions
m →Dump digging: +link |
Notification: proposed deletion of Historical digging. (TW) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
==[[Dump digging]]== |
==[[Dump digging]]== |
||
Hey there, nice work cleaning up this article. I see you did a substantial rewrite. But what are your sources? If you could also [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cite references]] for your content that would be excellent, and we may yet may a high quality article out of this. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">œ</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
Hey there, nice work cleaning up this article. I see you did a substantial rewrite. But what are your sources? If you could also [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cite references]] for your content that would be excellent, and we may yet may a high quality article out of this. -- [[User:OlEnglish|<font size="5">œ</font>]][[User talk:OlEnglish|<sup>™</sup>]] 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Historical digging]] == |
|||
<!--<includeonly>}}</includeonly>--> |
|||
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[Historical digging]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why. |
|||
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Historical digging|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.{{z78}}<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Uruiamme|I like to saw logs!]] ([[User talk:Uruiamme|talk]]) 03:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:48, 13 November 2011
|
Hey there, nice work cleaning up this article. I see you did a substantial rewrite. But what are your sources? If you could also cite references for your content that would be excellent, and we may yet may a high quality article out of this. -- Ϫ 05:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
The article Historical digging has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Template:Z78 I like to saw logs! (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)