User talk:Eeekster: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by AgentPolkaDot (talk) to last version by MiszaBot III |
|||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
I would cite [[WP:MUSICBIO|MUSICBIO]] No. 5, which is because he has released two albums on a major Chrisitian record label [[Sparrow Records|Sparrow]], and it does not specify it has to be individual or compilation albums. I would cite No. 6 as well because [[Bethany Dillon]] is a notable/noteworthy musician herself, which makes the compilation album able to be used in order satisfy the No. 5 requirement. I am glad you made me look at the rules.[[User:HotHat|HotHat]] ([[User talk:HotHat|talk]]) 05:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC) |
I would cite [[WP:MUSICBIO|MUSICBIO]] No. 5, which is because he has released two albums on a major Chrisitian record label [[Sparrow Records|Sparrow]], and it does not specify it has to be individual or compilation albums. I would cite No. 6 as well because [[Bethany Dillon]] is a notable/noteworthy musician herself, which makes the compilation album able to be used in order satisfy the No. 5 requirement. I am glad you made me look at the rules.[[User:HotHat|HotHat]] ([[User talk:HotHat|talk]]) 05:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
== November 2011 == |
|||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] Your recent editing history at [[:Occupy Cal]] shows that you are in danger of breaking the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. '''Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a [[WP:BLOCK|block]].''' |
|||
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's [[WP:TALK|talk page]] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. You may still be blocked for [[WP:EDITWAR|edit warring]] even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
|||
--Polka |
Revision as of 23:34, 20 November 2011
A cookie for you!
Illogicalpie has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for the tip
For adding References section @ [Cpufreq] by reachthehelios(talk)
Reachthehelios has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Jumer's Casino & Hotel
Hi. If you have a moment, please take a look at the images on this page. I'm afraid image policy is not my area, and I can't find out how to tag it with Twinkle. user has a history of uploading problematic files. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:55, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like they're CC licensed to me. But without a source... Eeekster (talk) 07:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- How do I get FfD onto my Twinkle? I wouln't risk deleting any files with my tools, but it would be handy to know how to tag them without sifting through pages of templates. Any help would be most welcome. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- It doesn't show on the tabs at the top of your screen? Eeekster (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Not in the tbs, but at the very top of the page like this:
Eeekster | My talk | My preferences| My watchlist | My contributions | online | busy | around | offline | sleep | Log out |
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- I have an XFD tab. Perhaps you need to go to twinkle's prefs to turn it on? Eeekster (talk) 03:28, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
I have added the refs that you requested
Hi,
Just to let you know that I have complied with your request regarding your proposed deletion of articles that I have started:
I wonder if you would be so kind as to remove your notice. Ottawahitech (talk) 02:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- What's wrong with doing it yourself? Eeekster (talk) 02:57, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Uniblue
Hi Eekster, what part of the article mentioned Uniblue is advertising so that i can edit it please Keithmonti (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- Pretty much all of it. Just like last time. Eeekster (talk) 08:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Eekster, Last time you deleted the article for copied text, and it wasnt even my article ? The content is now entirely new. Did you read it? There is zero promotion on it, it is all factual and notable events of a company in which there is vetter interest. In fact you can go to google trends and see that there are over 700 people a month querying Uniblue Wikipedia. Can you please take a closer look at the article, i would greatly appreciate it? Thank you Keithmonti (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Keithmonti has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
For the time you take to participate in the largest collection of knowledge on 1 site for free, for dealing with people like me everyday, from your own free will :) Keithmonti (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:William_Anthony_Artist_Portrait.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:William_Anthony_Artist_Portrait.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know this is actually a painting of Charles VIII of France's second son, Charles and not a painting of Suzanne. --Alexcoldcasefan (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, but why do I need to know that? Eeekster (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
NorrieParamorJustWeTwo.jpg etc.
Thanks Eeekster, to the non-free image notices. I've uploaded a number of these, and am going to go through and add non-free image rationales for all of them. All the best, 78.26 (talk) 01:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit
Hi, you almost got me indignant with that possible bug edit/warning. On a serious note this IP seems to me a sock of an editor I know. I'll try to find the similarity today. (I guess I remember from once when he forgot to log in). --lTopGunl (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
I would cite MUSICBIO No. 5, which is because he has released two albums on a major Chrisitian record label Sparrow, and it does not specify it has to be individual or compilation albums. I would cite No. 6 as well because Bethany Dillon is a notable/noteworthy musician herself, which makes the compilation album able to be used in order satisfy the No. 5 requirement. I am glad you made me look at the rules.HotHat (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Your recent editing history at Occupy Cal shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.
--Polka