User talk:Jabbsworth: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:38, 1 December 2011

Please note that I used to have another WP account and my actual edit count is 12,000+. Please don't template me; I am not a newbie.

This is Jabbsworth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Talk:List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming

BTW, I applaud your thoughts (at Talk:List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming), and welcome your contributions to the discussion; I'm sorry I'm throwing cold water on your excellent idea, but I think the article already suffers from some definitional issues that we've closed our eyes to, I don't want to make it worse.--SPhilbrick T 15:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, no offence taken. It's a thorny issue. Jabbsworth 15:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ratel --Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you did not read my comments at the SPI carefully enough. I'm not going to bother appealing this though as WP has become hopelessly melodramatic, officious, self-important and stacked with vested interests. I just regret giving so many hours of my life to assisting this website build a database. Fortunately, there are other similar venues, SourceWatch being merely one, and I look forward to seeing them grow in significance in the future. Jabbsworth 23:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 00:36, 1 December 2011 edit Elen of the Roads (talk \| contribs) 16,638 edits →November 2011: rmv link ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:38, 1 December 2011 edit undo Jabbsworth (talk \| contribs) 567 edits AFAIK, a link to this site is allowed. Next edit →
Line 27:		Line 27:


	:Clearly you did not read my comments at the SPI carefully enough. I'm not going to bother appealing this though as WP has become hopelessly melodramatic, officious, self-important and stacked with vested interests. I just regret giving so many hours of my life to assisting this website build a database.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Jabbsworth\|<font style="color:lightgrey;background:black;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Jabbsworth '''</font>]]</span></small> 23:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)		:Clearly you did not read my comments at the SPI carefully enough. I'm not going to bother appealing this though as WP has become hopelessly melodramatic, officious, self-important and stacked with vested interests. I just regret giving so many hours of my life to assisting this website build a database. Fortunately, there are other similar venues, [http://sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Talk:Matt_Drudge SourceWatch] being merely one, and I look forward to seeing them grow in significance in the future. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Jabbsworth\|<font style="color:lightgrey;background:black;font-family:sans-serif;">''' Jabbsworth '''</font>]]</span></small> 23:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)