User talk:Gooddays

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gooddays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This is not a sock. Please unblock. Gooddays (talk) 23:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If that were a valid reason for unblock, we might as well not have a sockpuppetry policy. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Gooddays (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not a sockpuppet and I've been blocked fro a wrong reason. How is that not a valid reason to unblock? Gooddays (talk) 03:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm not a sockpuppet and I've been blocked fro a wrong reason. How is that not a valid reason to unblock? [[User:Gooddays|Gooddays]] ([[User talk:Gooddays#top|talk]]) 03:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm not a sockpuppet and I've been blocked fro a wrong reason. How is that not a valid reason to unblock? [[User:Gooddays|Gooddays]] ([[User talk:Gooddays#top|talk]]) 03:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm not a sockpuppet and I've been blocked fro a wrong reason. How is that not a valid reason to unblock? [[User:Gooddays|Gooddays]] ([[User talk:Gooddays#top|talk]]) 03:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Reviewing admins may be interested to review not only the interesting contributions of this account, back from the blue after 3½ years to make shall we say two interesting edits to semi-protected pages, but also the recent histories of both articles recently edited, the history of Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists and related articles, as well as the open proxies involved, 210.87.254.115 (talk · contribs) (probably itself an open proxy) and Arisedrink (talk · contribs). Hello Gooddays, any narrative for your recent edits? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what your issues are, but please stop harassing me and accusing me of being a sockpuppet. You've caused me a lot of trouble in these past few days. Gooddays (talk) 16:30, 8 December 2011 (UTC)