Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The last of us: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:59, 8 December 2011

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article that is entirely speculative -- Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 20:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no substance to article. Crystal-ball-gazing. Possibly bring back when evidence becomes available. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-information suitable for a blog, not an encyclopedia. LadyofShalott 22:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The game is currently in development and Content will be added to the page as soon as it is available, i am still adding more detail to it as we speak. This game has now been announced and the wiki page should be created for it. -Fluffyman24- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluffyman24 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:CRYSTAL. Recreate once more solid facts are known. (No reason to keep until then - the entire article would virtually need to be redone anyways...) Sergecross73 msg me 16:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. The reason giving for keeping is "Content will be added to the page as soon as it is available", but we don't have articles on the basis of speculation that suitable information will become available some time in the future: we need evidence of notability now, and we haven't got it. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in reply to JamesBWatson, there is more information coming out on the 10/12/2011 there will be more information at that point.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 *'''Delete''' - [[WP:CRYSTAL]]. Recreate once more solid facts are known. (No reason to keep until then - the entire article would virtually need to be redone anyways...) [[User:Sergecross73|<font color="green">Sergecross73</font>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<font color="teal">msg me</font>]]  16:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' No evidence of notability. The reason giving for keeping is "Content will be added to the page as soon as it is available", but we don't have articles on the basis of speculation that suitable information will become available some time in the future: we need evidence of notability '''''now''''', and we haven't got it. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 12:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' in reply to [[User JamesBWatson]], there is more information coming out on the 10/12/2011 there will be more information at that point.
+*'''Keep''' in reply to JamesBWatson, there is more information coming out on the 10/12/2011 there will be more information at that point.