Talk:Iran–U.S. RQ-170 incident: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:46, 12 December 2011

Iran Unassessed

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The meaning of 'aviation crash'

This is not an article about an aircraft incident we are talking about incident when the plane has crashed. and the drone that was shown on tv (that was confirmed by US officials) was not a drone that had an accident but rather brought down with no damages. The seizing of the UAV was done by IRGC and the regular army of Iran - Mehrnia -

Any change of downing to crash will get reported to the moderators. 'There is no crashing here otherwise we would see the US drone in 100 pieces on TV. Stop editing please - Mehrnia )-

By both Iranian and US official accounts, the UAV in question crashed. I refer you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_accidents_and_incidents where aviation crash is defined as "an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight and all such persons have disembarked, in which a person is fatally or seriously injured, the aircraft sustains damage or structural failure or the aircraft is missing or is completely inaccessible." The UAV presented on Iranian television has sustained damage, therefore the aircraft in question has crashed. Furthermore, no evidence has been presented that the UAV has been downed. If you have evidence that the aircraft has been downed, please add it to the wiki page. --Bronzmajom (talk) 04:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox military conflict

Is the presence of this infobox even needed? It isn't a military conflict. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 14:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Merge proposal

Oppose for now. The political back and forth doesn't belong in an article about the platform itself, and this may expand into a larger diplomatic debacle. Suggest revisiting the merge proposal in a few months. --76.18.43.253 (talk) 16:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Oppose" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.64.219.3 (talk) 20:08, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Iran}}
+== The meaning of 'aviation crash' ==
 This is not an article about an aircraft ''incident''
@@ Line 5: / Line 7: @@
 Any change of ''downing'' to ''crash will get reported to the moderators. 'There is no crashing here otherwise we would see the US drone in 100 pieces on TV. Stop editing please - Mehrnia )-
+By both Iranian and US official accounts, the UAV in question crashed. I refer you to [[Aviation_accidents_and_incidents|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_accidents_and_incidents]] where aviation crash is defined as "an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight and all such persons have disembarked, in which a person is fatally or seriously injured, the aircraft sustains damage or structural failure or the aircraft is missing or is completely inaccessible." The UAV presented on Iranian television has sustained damage, therefore the aircraft in question has crashed. Furthermore, no evidence has been presented that the UAV has been ''downed''. If you have evidence that the aircraft has been ''downed'', please add it to the wiki page. --[[User:Bronzmajom|Bronzmajom]] ([[User talk:Bronzmajom|talk]]) 04:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 == Infobox military conflict ==