Talk:Theta model: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
1. First sentence brief and definitional? 0.9 |
1. First sentence brief and definitional? 0.9 |
||
Too many parenthetical phrases for a first sentence |
Too many parenthetical phrases for a first sentence |
||
2. Concise summary and overview of entire article? 0.9 |
2. Concise summary and overview of entire article? 0.9 |
||
Not clear that the QIF model belongs in introduction. |
Not clear that the QIF model belongs in introduction. |
||
3. Table of contents? 1 |
3. Table of contents? 1 |
||
4. Illustration? 1 |
4. Illustration? 1 |
||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
1. Background information clearly stated? 1 |
1. Background information clearly stated? 1 |
||
2. Overview of topic? 1 |
2. Overview of topic? 1 |
||
3. Key events in history of topic described? 1 |
3. Key events in history of topic described? 1 |
||
| Line 19: | Line 26: | ||
1. Clear description of each of the key topics listed in the outline? 0.7 |
1. Clear description of each of the key topics listed in the outline? 0.7 |
||
Says the theta model "blows up" near the bifurcation when the state |
|||
variables actually remain bounded. Probably confused by the period |
Says the theta model "blows up" near the bifurcation when the state variables actually remain bounded. Probably confused by the period blowing up. Some minor errors, e.g. in general a function does not have a closed form for its integral, much less for the PRC of the theta model. |
||
blowing up. Some minor errors, e.g. in general a function does not have a closed |
|||
form for its integral, much less for the PRC of the theta model. |
|||
2. Appropriate depth of detail? 0.9 |
2. Appropriate depth of detail? 0.9 |
||
Some key details missing, e.g. QIF model definition lacks description of reset. |
Some key details missing, e.g. QIF model definition lacks description of reset. |
||
3. Appropriate breadth? 1 |
3. Appropriate breadth? 1 |
||
Benchmark IV |
Benchmark IV |
||
| Line 31: | Line 40: | ||
1. Links to other Wikipedia articles for key words mentioned in entry? 0.9 |
1. Links to other Wikipedia articles for key words mentioned in entry? 0.9 |
||
Good, but could have more. |
Good, but could have more. |
||
2. Citations for all statements in text? 1 |
2. Citations for all statements in text? 1 |
||
3. Citations primarily based on peer-reviewed articles? 1 |
3. Citations primarily based on peer-reviewed articles? 1 |
||
4. List of citations in Wikipedia format (Notes)? 1 |
4. List of citations in Wikipedia format (Notes)? 1 |
||
5. From 3 to 10 additional references to read (References)? 1 |
5. From 3 to 10 additional references to read (References)? 1 |
||
6. From 3 to 10 external links (External Links)? 0.5 |
6. From 3 to 10 external links (External Links)? 0.5 |
||
Mostly links to other wikipedia articles, remaining 2 to scholarpedia |
Mostly links to other wikipedia articles, remaining 2 to scholarpedia |
||
Revision as of 21:54, 12 December 2011
Need to address the following points (1 = good, 0.5 = fair, 0.0 = bad)
1. First sentence brief and definitional? 0.9
Too many parenthetical phrases for a first sentence
2. Concise summary and overview of entire article? 0.9
Not clear that the QIF model belongs in introduction.
3. Table of contents? 1
4. Illustration? 1
Benchmark II
1. Background information clearly stated? 1
2. Overview of topic? 1
3. Key events in history of topic described? 1
Benchmark III
1. Clear description of each of the key topics listed in the outline? 0.7
Says the theta model "blows up" near the bifurcation when the state variables actually remain bounded. Probably confused by the period blowing up. Some minor errors, e.g. in general a function does not have a closed form for its integral, much less for the PRC of the theta model.
2. Appropriate depth of detail? 0.9
Some key details missing, e.g. QIF model definition lacks description of reset.
3. Appropriate breadth? 1
Benchmark IV
1. Links to other Wikipedia articles for key words mentioned in entry? 0.9
Good, but could have more.
2. Citations for all statements in text? 1
3. Citations primarily based on peer-reviewed articles? 1
4. List of citations in Wikipedia format (Notes)? 1
5. From 3 to 10 additional references to read (References)? 1
6. From 3 to 10 external links (External Links)? 0.5
Mostly links to other wikipedia articles, remaining 2 to scholarpedia