Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kennedys hut: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Weak support''' Looks better in full size. The blown-out sky doesn't disturb me, and it's unavoidable in this type of lighting - tha hut is deep in shade, and the bright, cloudy sky is behind the trees. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 07:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Weak support''' Looks better in full size. The blown-out sky doesn't disturb me, and it's unavoidable in this type of lighting - tha hut is deep in shade, and the bright, cloudy sky is behind the trees. --[[User:Janke|Janke]] | [[User talk:Janke|Talk]] 07:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''The sky is completely burned out. Also pic 02 looks better than this (at least no huge patch of burned out sky). --<span style="color: #58738c;">[[User: Antilived|antilived]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFC16F;">[[User_talk:Antilived|T]]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]]</sup> 09:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''The sky is completely burned out. Also pic 02 looks better than this (at least no huge patch of burned out sky). --<span style="color: #58738c;">[[User: Antilived|antilived]]</span> <sup><span style="color:#FFC16F;">[[User_talk:Antilived|T]]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/Antilived|C]]</sup> 09:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' very messy [[User:Leidiot|L]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e]]</font>[[User:Leidiot|idi]][[User talk:Leidiot|ot]] 09:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
{{breakafterimages}} |
{{breakafterimages}} |
Revision as of 09:46, 2 April 2006
Other version are availible here. (I kinda like the sepia effects)
- Support Self Nom. --Fir0002 www 23:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - good, but not great. Rather bland composition. -- P199 01:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know - the washed sky and non-directional light gives a very depressing feeling...but I don't dislike that...but I don't know if I like it either. Why does it look like the bark has exploded off of the surrounding trees?--Deglr6328 02:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- That's how eucalyptus trees look like! --Fir0002 www 03:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- neutral for now. the large tree is distracting. pschemp | talk 05:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support Looks better in full size. The blown-out sky doesn't disturb me, and it's unavoidable in this type of lighting - tha hut is deep in shade, and the bright, cloudy sky is behind the trees. --Janke | Talk 07:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- OpposeThe sky is completely burned out. Also pic 02 looks better than this (at least no huge patch of burned out sky). --antilived T | C 09:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose very messy Leidiot 09:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)