Talk:Java class loader: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
"Adding the new library to the list of available libraries instead of replacing it, may see the application still behaving as though the old library is in use, which it may well be." What? |
"Adding the new library to the list of available libraries instead of replacing it, may see the application still behaving as though the old library is in use, which it may well be." What? |
||
[[Special:Contributions/217.229.15.133|217.229.15.133]] ([[User talk:217.229.15.133|talk]]) 13:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/217.229.15.133|217.229.15.133]] ([[User talk:217.229.15.133|talk]]) 13:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Reference to object should be changed == |
|||
"Libraries can contain objects of different types. The most important type of object contained in a Jar file is a Java class." |
|||
It may be better to substitute 'object' with 'entity' to avoid confusion. |
Revision as of 10:24, 16 December 2011
Java Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-12-04. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Deletion of JAR hell
I noticed that this paged had been marked for deletion, so I gave it a shot. My first contribution, so comments, etc., welcomed. DenaDweller 00:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)lll
References?
It is not appropriate to link to one's own work, but here is a link that may be relevant to JAR hell case #3: It is US patent application number 20030167349, named Handling different service versions in a server. It's originally from around 1999, and if I remember correctly, there is a Finnish/European patent issued. -- Petri Krohn 23:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- In the EU there are no software patents. --80.99.1.94 (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, there are. Read the Wikipedia article on Software Patents#Europe, specifically:
- Article 52 EPC excludes "programs for computers" from patentability (Art. 52(2)) to the extent that a patent application relates to a computer program "as such" (Art. 52(3)). This has been interpreted to mean that any invention which makes a non-obvious "technical contribution" or solves a "technical problem" in a non-obvious way is patentable even if that technical problem is solved by running a computer program.
- 203.193.119.196 (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, there are. Read the Wikipedia article on Software Patents#Europe, specifically:
This article contains some interesting external references. Wikimsd 10:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
JSR 277
Regarding the claim that Sun Microsystems has put development of JSR 277 on hold, this is the closest to an official announcement I can find: http://blogs.sun.com/mr/entry/jigsaw
Wdyoung (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Can somebody clean up / explain in a comprehensible way the cases of "Jar hell"?
"Adding the new library to the list of available libraries instead of replacing it, may see the application still behaving as though the old library is in use, which it may well be." What? 217.229.15.133 (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Reference to object should be changed
"Libraries can contain objects of different types. The most important type of object contained in a Jar file is a Java class."
It may be better to substitute 'object' with 'entity' to avoid confusion.