User talk:86.44.31.213

December 2011

Hello. Please do not remove the "spa" tag after your signature, when you make talk page comments. Thank you. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

there's no reason why i should not remove it. this is called Wikipedia:Edit_warring. thank you. 86.44.31.213 (talk) 23:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, 86.44.31.213. You have new messages at CharlieEchoTango's talk page.
Message added 19:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Abn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Abn was changed by 86.44.31.213 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873479 on 2011-12-22T00:23:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimme All Your Luvin (Madonna song)

Thanks for your support. I have no particular interest in the topic, but it struck me that none of the votes for deletion seemed to be based on any sort of policy. I'd been looking for that quote you provided but hadn't been able to find it. Thanks again. Pburka (talk) 03:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. In my view it meets WP:NSONGS in any case, which seems meant to supplement the GNG and provide "probable outcomes" based on it and even possible exceptions to it. when it mentions notability, i take it to mean wp:n. but since i don't know the intent behind it (since i don't know for instance, why there is no specific clause about significant coverage), who knows? 86.44.31.213 (talk) 04:00, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anónimo Consejo

Hello 86, this is just to say that I have rewritten this article so even though you have already !voted keep, you might be interested in looking at it again. Thanks, Nolelover ^{Talk·Contribs} 00:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)