User talk:Coercorash: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 4 thread(s) (older than 60d) to User talk:Coercorash/Archive 2. |
Raqib nizami (talk | contribs) What! Have they settled some Plan (among themselves)? But it is We Who settle things. (43:79) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Salam,Im a Sunni Sufi Muslim,I joined new as an editor.I tried to edit the biography of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.It was full of lies in the biggining.I tried to add some helpful ref to proof that he was not at all a great Sunni scholar and to establish that he tried to form a firqa(sect)Wahhabism.Also i tried to create an assessment tittle to reveal his real truth. now im having debate on the discussion forum. but im alone others are Wahhabi extremist.I suggested an edit request pls help me to get it right.i also need your help to guide me how to be better in this article.[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Salam,Im a Sunni Sufi Muslim,I joined new as an editor.I tried to edit the biography of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.It was full of lies in the biggining.I tried to add some helpful ref to proof that he was not at all a great Sunni scholar and to establish that he tried to form a firqa(sect)Wahhabism.Also i tried to create an assessment tittle to reveal his real truth. now im having debate on the discussion forum. but im alone others are Wahhabi extremist.I suggested an edit request pls help me to get it right.i also need your help to guide me how to be better in this article.[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Actually most articles related to islam,especially these(related to wahabism) have been |
:Actually most articles related to islam,especially these(related to wahabism) have been hijacked by wahabi editors. They are representing their view such that a neutral thinking persons consider it true what wahabis are saying. Almost every one on Wikipedia are supporting the wahabi view intentionally or unintentionally. If you edit something ,they say you are not neutral. But if you praise him (M ibn AW),no one asks you about the neural PoV. That's what going all over Wikipedia. You hardly find any Sunni but here is bunch of Wahhabi,and they are taking advantage of this number ratio. |
||
::'''[[User:Coercorash|<font color="gold">Coercorash</font>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Coercorash|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Coercorash|<font color="blue">Contr.</font>]]</sup> </sup> 09:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
::'''[[User:Coercorash|<font color="gold">Coercorash</font>]]'''<sup>[[User Talk:Coercorash|<font color="green">Talk</font>]]<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Coercorash|<font color="blue">Contr.</font>]]</sup> </sup> 09:55, 4 January 2012 (UTC) |
||
==its not all about number== |
|||
[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)i totally agree what you said.Also i would like to add that they agree and have no objection to criticize our holy Prophet(pbuh)!! but they refuse to do so for mhanmmad bin aw!i thing they get fund/donation to do so!!But brother always remember From the early time of Islam we were very few Rasulillah(pbuh) fought battles and won it thought it was 10:100!Now we live in the world of fitna akheri zamana!now the ratio is 72:1!we are very little in num. it will be like this till qiamat exept during the time of imam Mahdi ruling this world.So let us stick together against this fitnatul Wahhabiya Dajjaliya and take part in this battle field of Editing fitna.Where each step is like doing jihad against evil.This is the teaching Imam Hussain Taught us by sacrificing his life.We cant dishonor them just by stepping aside and keep silent.dont worry the victory will be ours.Allah says-'Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad SAW) a manifest victory.That Allah may forgive you your sins of the past and the future[], and complete His Favor on you, and guide you on the Straight Path.And that Allâh may help you with strong help.He it is Who sent down As-Sakinah (calmness and tranquility) into the hearts of the believers, that they may grow more in Faith along with their (present) Faith'.(48:1-4)[[User:Raqib nizami|Raqib nizami]] ([[User talk:Raqib nizami|talk]]) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== April 2011 == |
== April 2011 == |
||
Revision as of 21:18, 6 January 2012
| This is Coercorash's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
 | This User is academicaly busy,so he may not respond you immediately,but feel free to contact. |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Welcome to Wikipedia Your creation at 10:20, 2 October 2009 of this page included a reference name, <ref name="ww4report.com"/>, that is causing a cite error. Can you go back and fix the error? 75.69.0.58 (talk) 08:11, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
help needed for Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab biography
Raqib nizami (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)Salam,Im a Sunni Sufi Muslim,I joined new as an editor.I tried to edit the biography of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.It was full of lies in the biggining.I tried to add some helpful ref to proof that he was not at all a great Sunni scholar and to establish that he tried to form a firqa(sect)Wahhabism.Also i tried to create an assessment tittle to reveal his real truth. now im having debate on the discussion forum. but im alone others are Wahhabi extremist.I suggested an edit request pls help me to get it right.i also need your help to guide me how to be better in this article.Raqib nizami (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Actually most articles related to islam,especially these(related to wahabism) have been hijacked by wahabi editors. They are representing their view such that a neutral thinking persons consider it true what wahabis are saying. Almost every one on Wikipedia are supporting the wahabi view intentionally or unintentionally. If you edit something ,they say you are not neutral. But if you praise him (M ibn AW),no one asks you about the neural PoV. That's what going all over Wikipedia. You hardly find any Sunni but here is bunch of Wahhabi,and they are taking advantage of this number ratio.
its not all about number
Raqib nizami (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)i totally agree what you said.Also i would like to add that they agree and have no objection to criticize our holy Prophet(pbuh)!! but they refuse to do so for mhanmmad bin aw!i thing they get fund/donation to do so!!But brother always remember From the early time of Islam we were very few Rasulillah(pbuh) fought battles and won it thought it was 10:100!Now we live in the world of fitna akheri zamana!now the ratio is 72:1!we are very little in num. it will be like this till qiamat exept during the time of imam Mahdi ruling this world.So let us stick together against this fitnatul Wahhabiya Dajjaliya and take part in this battle field of Editing fitna.Where each step is like doing jihad against evil.This is the teaching Imam Hussain Taught us by sacrificing his life.We cant dishonor them just by stepping aside and keep silent.dont worry the victory will be ours.Allah says-'Verily, We have given you (O Muhammad SAW) a manifest victory.That Allah may forgive you your sins of the past and the future[], and complete His Favor on you, and guide you on the Straight Path.And that Allâh may help you with strong help.He it is Who sent down As-Sakinah (calmness and tranquility) into the hearts of the believers, that they may grow more in Faith along with their (present) Faith'.(48:1-4)Raqib nizami (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jankhilavan Jasoos, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- -Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 07:01, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Dnyanopasak College Of Arts, Commerce, Science, and Technology
Hello Coercorash. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dnyanopasak College Of Arts, Commerce, Science, and Technology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:40, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Harry Potter and the Fortress of Shadows
On 19 June 2011, you tagged Harry Potter and the Fortress of Shadows with {{rfd}}, but you did not complete the nomination by listing it at WP:RFD. Can you please complete the second step of the nomination per the instructions at the WP:RFD page? If you do not list it within a reasonable amount of time, I'll assume you no longer wish to see it deleted and will remove the template. Thanks. -- JLaTondre (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2011 (UTC)