Jump to content

Talk:Meng Huo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add listas per WP:NAMESORT using AWB
EkmanLi (talk | contribs)
Line 50: Line 50:


:Where can I find this article? Is it on the internet somewhere? [[User:Plunged|Plunged]] ([[User talk:Plunged|talk]]) 14:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
:Where can I find this article? Is it on the internet somewhere? [[User:Plunged|Plunged]] ([[User talk:Plunged|talk]]) 14:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

== Quote on Pei Songzi's view over Xi Zaochi ==

Huang Chengzhong uses Pei Songzhi's accusation against Xi Zaochi of anachronistically inserting quotations in the biography of [[Wang Ling (Three Kingdoms)|Wang Ling]] in his article, ''Did Zhuge Liang really Capture Meng Huo Seven Times?'' (''諸葛亮真的“七擒孟獲”嗎?''). At first glance it's easy for people to perceive it as a "textual manipulation done to cast meng huo as fictional." However, after I read the whole article of Huang Chengzhong, I can only logically believe he adopts that quote because he wants to show Xi Zaochi as the first one(s) who "make up" the '''stories like the "7 times freed."'''("'''如'''此言之类,皆前史所不载,而犹出习氏。且制言法体不似于昔,疑悉凿齿所自造者也?")

Also, it should not be a "textual manipulation done to cast meng huo as fictional" at all, because Huang believes in the historicity of Meng Huo, and this fact has actually been pointed out in the main article before the quote.

[[User:EkmanLi|EkmanLi]] ([[User talk:EkmanLi|talk]]) 04:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:10, 7 January 2012

WikiProject iconBiography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
WikiProject iconChina Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconThree Kingdoms Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Three Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Three Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some open WikiProject Three Kingdoms tasks:

  • Meta-tasks:
    • Place the {{WP3K}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
    • Get pictures for the infoboxes of the 3K people.
    • Add references to the articles.
  • Improvement Drive
    • Segregate fact and fiction for all biography and history articles.

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

The Nanman King Meng Huo

At the time of the Wu and Wei battles, Zhuge Liang decides to launch a full assault on the Nanman tribes. After heading south to the lands of China, the Shu startegist captures and releases the Nanman King Meng Huo 7 times to force him into surrender.

If the Meng Huo and his forces outnumbered the Shu forces, how is it that Meng Huo was caught 7 times. Due to the terrain that the Nanman people lived in the Shu army should have encounter some difficults while traveling through the land. If Zhuge Liang did capture Meng Huo 7 times, what, if any, methods did he go about rather than meet the Nanman in head on battle and if Meng Huo would serve the Shu forces, how long would time permit him to do so.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanman QED


Meng Huo's depiction

I don't think that the picture from Dynasty Warriors needs to be there. Think about if someone like Socrates, who we don't know the look of, had a video game character on his Wikipedia page. Also, I doubt that Meng Huo had metal claws. I say the photo should be taken off this page. --Riction 08:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The picture and the over-lengthy section on his appearance in Dynasty Warriors makes the article look like a joke, if you ask me. 67.46.0.13 11:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC) (Not anonymous, firewall at my job won't let me stay logged in, user ID is Themill).[reply]

A joke? As opposed to another emotion you are attempting to invoke with that scribbled image at the top? The picture only cites the most modern reference to Meng Huo. If you have an image from the television series or something from another modern reference, then replace it. Those claws are weapons, larger versions of the "cat claw" used throughout history by many Eastern warriors and assassins. I don't see how modern references to historical individuals are a "joke," and I see that disdain for the video game medium is as alive and well as ever. I wonder if you'd rubbish the section if it was derived from a book or movie instead. Gamer Junkie 12:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Meng Huo.jpg

Image:Meng Huo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meng Huo

According to Zhang Hua Lan's article, "Discussion on Meng Huo," Meng was only a fictional character invented by later historians. Modern historians like Huang Cheng Zhong also pointed out Zhang's view represents the majority of the academics. Note that the the word "Huo" (獲) means "captured" in Chinese.----EkmanLi (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I find this article? Is it on the internet somewhere? Plunged (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quote on Pei Songzi's view over Xi Zaochi

Huang Chengzhong uses Pei Songzhi's accusation against Xi Zaochi of anachronistically inserting quotations in the biography of Wang Ling in his article, Did Zhuge Liang really Capture Meng Huo Seven Times? (諸葛亮真的“七擒孟獲”嗎?). At first glance it's easy for people to perceive it as a "textual manipulation done to cast meng huo as fictional." However, after I read the whole article of Huang Chengzhong, I can only logically believe he adopts that quote because he wants to show Xi Zaochi as the first one(s) who "make up" the stories like the "7 times freed."("此言之类,皆前史所不载,而犹出习氏。且制言法体不似于昔,疑悉凿齿所自造者也?")

Also, it should not be a "textual manipulation done to cast meng huo as fictional" at all, because Huang believes in the historicity of Meng Huo, and this fact has actually been pointed out in the main article before the quote.

EkmanLi (talk) 04:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]