Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Agustín Ross Cultural Center/1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Agustín Ross Cultural Center: Not listed |
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) Move to next archive |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: {{al|Agustín Ross Cultural Center|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Agust%C3%ADn_Ross_Cultural_Center/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Agustín Ross Cultural Center/GA1|Most recent review]] |
: {{al|Agustín Ross Cultural Center|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Agust%C3%ADn_Ross_Cultural_Center/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • [[Talk:Agustín Ross Cultural Center/GA1|Most recent review]] |
||
{{#ifeq:Wikipedia|Wikipedia|<span>|{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}} {{error|It should only be used for closing community reassessments.}}<span style="display:none;">}}{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Agustín Ross Cultural Center/1|[[Category:GAR/ |
{{#ifeq:Wikipedia|Wikipedia|<span>|{{error:not substituted|GAR/result}} {{error|It should only be used for closing community reassessments.}}<span style="display:none;">}}{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Agustín Ross Cultural Center/1|[[Category:GAR/53]]}} '''Result''': '''Not Listed''' A new review has been started rendering this one obsolete</span> [[User:Aircorn|AIR<font color="green">'''''corn'''''</font>]] [[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 05:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
<!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> |
<!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> |
||
Revision as of 02:43, 8 January 2012
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
Result: Not Listed A new review has been started rendering this one obsolete AIRcorn (talk) 05:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
I believe this review is totally unacceptable; an article like this couldn't have been failed for a couple of minor, consistency issues. And so, I'm requesting reassessing having fixed those minor mistakes. Thanks! Diego talk 22:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- The article looks in fairly good shape, but if you need a full review then nominate it again at GAN. It may well be quicker as GARs can often hang about for months. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- If you say so... Diego talk 22:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)