Jump to content

Talk:Early Dynastic Period (Egypt): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
-Ilhador- (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
rating
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AncientEgyptBanner|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{AncientEgyptBanner|class=Start|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Former countries
{{WikiProject Former countries|class=Start|infoboxneeded=yes}}
|infoboxneeded=yes}}


==[Untitled]==
I have moved this article from '''Early Dynastic Period''' to '''Early Dynastic Period of Egypt''' for the simple reason that the terms is not exclusive to Egypt and is also used in (e.g.) Mesopotamia —[[User:Nefertum17|Nefertum17]] 13:17, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I have moved this article from '''Early Dynastic Period''' to '''Early Dynastic Period of Egypt''' for the simple reason that the terms is not exclusive to Egypt and is also used in (e.g.) Mesopotamia —[[User:Nefertum17|Nefertum17]] 13:17, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)



Revision as of 10:13, 20 January 2012

Template:AncientEgyptBanner

WikiProject iconFormer countries Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

[Untitled]

I have moved this article from Early Dynastic Period to Early Dynastic Period of Egypt for the simple reason that the terms is not exclusive to Egypt and is also used in (e.g.) Mesopotamia —Nefertum17 13:17, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Distinction between Old Kingdom and Early Dynastic

Shouldn't this article include the reasons why egyptologists draw a distinction between the Early Dynastic period and the Old Kingdom? I'm unclear on those reasons myself. There was a rise in prosperity and in the scale of constructions (pyramids), but that alone doesn't seem enough to divide the two periods. If anyone has this information, please add it. A. Parrot (talk) 04:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Several wordings in this article are highly identical with the passage "The Emergence of the Egyptian State" in The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (edited by Ian Shaw, first published in 2000, ISBN 0198150342).

From The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt Article's latest version
With the 1st Dynasty, the focus of development shifted from south to north, and the early Egyptian state was a centrally controlled polity ruled by a (god-)king from the Memphis region. (p.64) With the First Dynasty, the capital moved from Abydos to Memphis where an Egyptian god-king ruled a now unified polity that extended from the Nile Delta to the first cataract at Aswan.
...the Early Dynasty state that emerged in Egypt was unique and indigenous in character. It is likely that a common language, or dialects of that language, facilitated political unification, but nothing is really known about the spoken language... (p.64) State formation in Egypt was primarily indigenous in character, and it is likely that a common language, namely Egyptian, was spoken in Upper and Lower Egypt in variant dialects, which facilitated the unification.

At this stage, I will just list out the book in the reference section. Anyone is welcome to rewrite those lines.--Onlim (talk) 06:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Southern Levant less political than Canaan?

I changed Palestine to Canaan, and User:AnnekeBart changed to to Southern Levant. The problem with this term is that it's quite vague and, according to the map in its article, covers a much larger area. Now, Canaan is a rather NPOV term that is used by Arabs as well (Kanaan is an Arabic surname) and also by mainstream archeologists. TFighterPilot (talk) 13:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]