Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Lou franklin/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
reverting my move of comments. there are some accusations there (though not a single diff, wonder why), I guess it's evidence just as much as the other rant, and I'm not moving all of it. |
moved from main page |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Response to evidence presented by Malthusian== |
|||
<small>regarding Lou's beginning to edit pages not related to SATH </small> |
|||
I was encouraged to comment on that discussion page by one of the gay editors of the Societal attitudes towards homosexuality article [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASocietal_attitudes_towards_homosexuality&diff=46637909&oldid=46637669]. Not exactly a "campaign". [[User:Lou franklin|Lou franklin]] 12:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:As if the evidence doesn't speak for itself, I can vouch for that (I was the "gay editor" - I'm not just a sexuality, but do actually have a name, Lou). I thought that since he had already taken issue with [[:Category:LGBT civil rights]] and there was already discussion about changing the name, a loud voice would actually be useful there. -[[User:Sethmahoney|Seth Mahoney]] 01:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::I'm aware of that. My opening statement was incorrect, because it said that all Lou's edits related to SATH, which is no longer true, so I changed it. That's all. --[[User:Samuel Blanning|Sam Blanning]]<sup>[[User_talk:Samuel_Blanning|(talk)]]</sup> 10:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:02, 6 April 2006
Response to evidence presented by Malthusian
regarding Lou's beginning to edit pages not related to SATH
I was encouraged to comment on that discussion page by one of the gay editors of the Societal attitudes towards homosexuality article [1]. Not exactly a "campaign". Lou franklin 12:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- As if the evidence doesn't speak for itself, I can vouch for that (I was the "gay editor" - I'm not just a sexuality, but do actually have a name, Lou). I thought that since he had already taken issue with Category:LGBT civil rights and there was already discussion about changing the name, a loud voice would actually be useful there. -Seth Mahoney 01:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that. My opening statement was incorrect, because it said that all Lou's edits related to SATH, which is no longer true, so I changed it. That's all. --Sam Blanning(talk) 10:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)