Talk:Tay–Sachs disease: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:05, 30 January 2012

Tay–Sachs disease is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 24, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
May 30, 2009	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Former featured article candidate

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tay–Sachs disease article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1

Archives

1

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:V0.5

Template:WikiProject Genetics

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine: Genetics / Neurology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Medical genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology

Tay–Sachs disease received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Tay–Sachs disease is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by ~~Ebe123~~ on the go! at 23:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Note: Has been a FAC, and is currently having a discussion on being A-class again. Contacted the GoCE for a copy-edit. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality

As this article talks way more about the Jews that have the disease, and not the others, I will be adding a neutrality tag. Some instances of it are:

~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the academic literature such as this paper PMID: 12108829 it mentions Jewish people as the carrier state is 10 times more common and thus homozygous individuals would occur in 1 in 3600 as opposed to 1 in 360,000 in the general population.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but there was WP:UNDUE weight there. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 14:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed one section that was just poor. But the rest... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SS

I suggest that we get this as Wikipedia:Summary Style. Getting Tay–Sachs disease#Genetics, Tay–Sachs disease#Prevention, Tay–Sachs disease#History, Tay–Sachs disease#Society and culture, and Tay–Sachs disease#Research directions. The page is 58,720 bytes long, justifying the splitting. I'm posting this here as I won't be bold here as it's pretty fustrating being reverted for these things. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 19:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I support summarizing and creating Prevention of Tay-Sachs disease etc. with a main link.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will. Also webciting some references. Lets try to get this to GA. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 19:21, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A-Class

As some editors have improved the article even more from when it was re-promoted, I suggest that we get get this back. It is getting peer reviewed and I've requested copyediting. This article stands a chance at FA (I think). Apparently, we need 2 uninvolved users to endorse promoting this. So if you're uninvolved and think this article should be A-class, you may sign and comment. You may also participate in the peer review. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:46, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Define uninvolved? - Sudo Ghost 01:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I interpret "uninvolved" as not making numerous editorial changes. I don't think your one revert to this article disbars you from voting. Cheers, Magister Scienta ^talk 02:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that it may be changed now, as 2 people have supported, and it's been over a week. No opposes either. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 11:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A-class promotion vote

Supports

After reviewing the article, I support its bid for A status. Magister Scienta ^talk 02:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Likewise. - Sudo Ghost 10:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Opposes

Neutral

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 :Define uninvolved? - [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 01:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 ::I interpret "uninvolved" as not making numerous editorial changes. I don't think your one revert to this article disbars you from voting. Cheers, [[User:Magister Scienta|<font color="#4682B4">Magister Scienta</font>]][[User talk:Magister Scienta|<sup><font color="#228B22">talk</font></sup>]] 02:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
+:::I guess that it may be changed now, as 2 people have supported, and it's been over a week.  No opposes either.  ~~[[User:Ebe123|<span style="text-shadow:#9e6d3f 2px 2px 1px; color:#21421E; font-weight:bold;">Ebe</span><span style="color:#000000">123</span>]]~~ → <small>[[User talk:Ebe123|report]] on my [[Special:Contributions/Ebe123|contribs]].</small> 11:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 ===A-class promotion vote===