Maquiladora: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:38, 1 February 2012

A maquiladora (Spanish pronunciation: [makilaˈðoɾa]) or maquila (IPA: [maˈkila])^[1] is a Mexican manufacturing operation in which a factory imports materials and equipment on a duty-free and tariff-free basis for assembly, processing, or manufacturing and then re-exports the assembled, processed, or manufactured product, sometimes back to the raw materials' country of origin.

Currently about 1.3 million Mexicans are employed in one or more of approximately 3,000 maquiladoras.^[2]^[3]

The term maquiladora, in the Spanish language, refers to the practice of millers charging a maquila, or "miller's portion" for processing other people's grain.^[4]

History

In 1964, the Bracero Program, which allowed Mexican agricultural workers to work legally in the U.S. on a seasonal basis, came to an end. Less than a year after the end of the Bracero Program, the Mexican Government launched the Border Industrialization Program (BIP) or the Maquiladora Program, to solve the problem of rising unemployment along the border.^[5] The maquiladoras became attractive to the US firms due to availability of cheap labor, devaluations of peso and favorable changes in the US customs laws.^{[citation needed]} In 1985 maquiladoras overtook tourism as the largest source of foreign exchange, and after 1996 has been the second largest industry in Mexico behind the petroleum industry.^[6]

The North American Free Trade Agreement (1994) favorably impacted the growth of maquila plants. During the five years before NAFTA, the maquila employment had grown at the rate of 47%; this figure increased to 86% in the next five years. The number of maquila plants grew from about 2700 to about 3700 in 2001.^[7] In the 1970s, most maquiladoras were located around the Mexico – United States border. By 1994, these were spread in the interior parts of the country, although majority of the plants were still near the border.

Although the maquiladora industry suffered due to the early 2000s recession, maquiladoras constituted 54% of the US-Mexico trade in 2004, and by 2005, the maquiladora exports accounted for half of Mexico's exports.^[7] The industry had become an important source of FDI and foreign exchange for Mexico.^{[citation needed]}

In the 2000s, the maquila industry faced competition due to rise of other countries with availability of cheap labor, including Malaysia, India, and Pakistan. The biggest threat came from China's Special Economic Areas.^[7]

Growth and development

During the later half of the sixties, maquiladora industries rapidly expanded both geographically and economically and by 1985, had become Mexico’s second largest source of income from foreign exports, behind oil.^[8] Since 1973, maquiladoras have also accounted for nearly half of Mexico’s export assembly.^[8] Between 1995 and 2000, exports of assembled products in Mexico tripled, and the rate of the industry’s growth amounted to about one new factory per day.^[9] By the late twentieth century, the industry accounted for approximately 25 percent of Mexico’s gross domestic product, and 17 percent of total Mexican employment.^[10]

Since globalization and physical restructuring^{[citation needed]} have contributed to the competition and advent of low-cost offshore assembly in places like China, and countries in Central America, maquiladoras in Mexico have been on the decline since 2000: According to federal sources, approximately 529 maquiladoras shut down and investment in assembly plants decreased by 8.2 percent in 2002.^[9] Despite the decline, there still exist over 3,000 maquiladoras along the 2,000 mile-long United States–Mexico border, providing employment for approximately one million workers, and importing more than $51 billion in supplies into Mexico.^[11] As of 2006, maquiladoras still account for 45 percent of Mexico’s exports.^[12] Maquiladoras, in general, are best represented among operations that are particularly assembly intensive.

Working conditions

One of the main goals of the Border Industrialization Program was to attract foreign investment. To do that, Mexican labor is kept cheap and competitive with other major export countries to keep the United States firms operating within the Mexican assembly plants. Mexican women work for approximately one-sixth of the U.S. hourly rate.^[13] Employee turnover is also relatively high, reaching up to 80 percent in some maquiladoras, due in part to stress and health threats common to this type of labor.^[14]

Workers are paid very low wages (often not a living wage), live in poor conditions, and have very low job security.^[15]

Macroeconomic effects of the maquiladora industry

As a result of NAFTA, approximately 750,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs have been lost, and replaced by maquiladora labor.^[16]

Gender composition of workforce

Mexico possesses a strong system of labor laws, yet enforcement of these laws within the maquiladora industry is often lax.^[17] While most people who were employed under the original Bracero Program were men, the majority of maquiladora employees are young women.^[18] Women are preferred to men, because women typically work for cheaper wages and are easier for male employers to direct. Some maquiladora operators have admitted a preference for women also because women often display a greater level of patience and higher dexterity than men in performing the repetitive work of an assembly plant. The maquila industry has been accused^{[by whom?]} of sexual exploitation of women. Opponents of this allegation^[who?] argue that women are paid higher wages working in a maquiladora than they commonly would in other forms of employment in northern Mexico. In addition, some have argued that maquiladora employment enables women to make their own money and thus become more independent, while teaching them new skills and giving them more opportunities that they may not otherwise acquire.

The maquiladora operators have also been accused of discriminating against child-bearing-aged women to keep costs down, because Mexico’s labor laws contain extensive maternity requirements. They often demand pregnancy tests as a prerequisite to employment or insist that female workers use birth control.^[19] If a woman is found to be pregnant, it may likely hinder her chances of getting hired, and if an existing worker becomes pregnant, she may be terminated.^[19]

In recent years, however, there has been a shift toward hiring more male workers due to labor shortages and the emergence of heavier industries operating within maquiladoras.

Environmental effects

Much of the environmental damage, particularly in the border region of Mexico, are attributed to Mexico’s economic development strategies and intense industrialization. The dense population of maquiladoras and the inability of Mexico’s environmental regulatory program to keep up with the rapid growth of the industry over the past quarter of a century have contributed to major environmental problems. Both the United States and Mexican governments claim to be committed to environmental protection, yet environmental policies have not always been enforced.^[20] Although the La Paz Agreement signed by Mexico and the United States in 1983 requires hazardous waste created by United States’ corporations to be transported back to the U.S. for disposal, some companies avoid paying disposal costs by dumping toxins and other waste into Mexico’s rivers or deserts. The United States Environmental Protection Agency reports that only 91 of the 600 maquiladoras located along the Texas-Mexico border have returned waste to the United States since 1987.^[21]

Mexico’s waste imports have nearly doubled in recent years, and most of this waste comes from the United States.^[22] In Mexico, some maquiladoras lack proper waste management facilities and the ability to clean up disposal sites, which is why some of the hazardous waste is illegally disposed of.^[21] Environmental hazards associated with some maquiladoras include polluted rivers and contaminated drinking water. According to the Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP), all streams and rivers in the border region have been ecologically devastated as a consequence of the maquila industry.^[23] Furthermore, the United States Geological Survey, the state of California, and the Imperial County Health Department have all asserted the New River, which flows from Mexicali near the border to the Salton Sea in California to be "...the dirtiest river in America."^[24] Ongoing exposure to toxic wastes can contribute to health problems such as cancer, skin disease, hepatitis, and birth defects. Furthermore, Mexico does not have any laws requiring industries to publicize basic environmental data on their operations, and so Mexico does not keep a very accurate inventory of hazardous waste.^[21]

The Border 2012 plan devised by the EPA has an extensive plan to help with environmental issues along the US Mexico Border.^[25]

References

^ Also referred to as a "twin plant", or "in-bond" industry.^{[citation needed]}
^ "The Rebirth of Solidarity on the Border" article by David Bacon in Democratic Left, the publication of the Democratic Socialists of America, Fall 2011
^ http://www.joseacontreras.net/empmex/maquila1.htm#_Toc506557418
^ Wilson, Patricia A. Exports and Local Development: Mexico's New Maquiladoras. p. 139.
^ Joan Ferrante (9780495005612). Sociology: a global perspective. p. 38. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
^ Sweatshop warriors: immigrant women workers take on the global factory. South End Press. 2001. p. 69. ISBN 9780896086388. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
^ ^a ^b ^c Vietor, Richard H.K (2 February 2007), American Outsourcing, p. 6, 9-705-037 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
^ ^a ^b Stoddard, Ellwyn R. Maquila: Assembly Plants in Northern Mexico. p. 2.
^ ^a ^b Shorris, Earl. The Life and Times of Mexico. p. 531
^ Hausman, Angela and Diana L Haytko. Cross-border Supply Chain Relationships: Interpretive Research of Maquiladora Realized Strategies. p. 25.
^ Villalobos, J Rene, et al. Inbound for Mexico. p. 38.
^ Gruben, William C. and Sherry L. Kiser. The Border Economy: NAFTA and Maquiladoras: Is the Growth Connected?
^ The Human Race: Escaping From History.
^ Kourous, George. Workers' Health is on the Line: Occupational Health and Safety in the Maquiladoras. p. 52.
^ Cravy, Altha J. (1998). Women and work in Mexico's maquiladoras. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 71–73. ISBN 9780847688869.
^ Nassar, Jamal Raji (2010). Globalization and terrorism: the migration of dreams and nightmares. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 11. ISBN 9780742557888.
^ Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 1.
^ Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 3.
^ ^a ^b Human Rights Watch. p. 31
^ Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 42.
^ ^a ^b ^c Kelly, Mary E. Free Trade: The Politics of Toxic Waste. p. 48
^ Clapp, Jennifer. Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA's Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico. p. 25.
^ CorpWatch. Maquiladoras at a Glance.
^ Sklair, Leslie. Assembling For Development: The Maquila Industry in Mexico and the United States. p. 94.
^ US-Mexico Border 2012 Program

External links

CorpWatch, Maquiladoras at a Glance. June 30, 1999.
International Museum of Women Feature on Maquiladoras

[1] Also referred to as a "twin plant", or "in-bond" industry.^{[citation needed]}

[2] "The Rebirth of Solidarity on the Border" article by David Bacon in Democratic Left, the publication of the Democratic Socialists of America, Fall 2011

[3] ttp://www.joseacontreras.net/empmex/maquila1.htm#_Toc506557418

[4] Wilson, Patricia A. Exports and Local Development: Mexico's New Maquiladoras. p. 139.

[5] Joan Ferrante (9780495005612). Sociology: a global perspective. p. 38. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)

[6] Sweatshop warriors: immigrant women workers take on the global factory. South End Press. 2001. p. 69. ISBN 9780896086388. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)

[AmericanOutsourcing-7] Vietor, Richard H.K (2 February 2007), American Outsourcing, p. 6, 9-705-037 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

[stoddard2-8] Stoddard, Ellwyn R. Maquila: Assembly Plants in Northern Mexico. p. 2.

[shorris531-9] Shorris, Earl. The Life and Times of Mexico. p. 531

[10] Hausman, Angela and Diana L Haytko. Cross-border Supply Chain Relationships: Interpretive Research of Maquiladora Realized Strategies. p. 25.

[11] Villalobos, J Rene, et al. Inbound for Mexico. p. 38.

[12] Gruben, William C. and Sherry L. Kiser. The Border Economy: NAFTA and Maquiladoras: Is the Growth Connected?

[13] The Human Race: Escaping From History.

[14] Kourous, George. Workers' Health is on the Line: Occupational Health and Safety in the Maquiladoras. p. 52.

[15] Cravy, Altha J. (1998). Women and work in Mexico's maquiladoras. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 71–73. ISBN 9780847688869.

[16] Nassar, Jamal Raji (2010). Globalization and terrorism: the migration of dreams and nightmares. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 11. ISBN 9780742557888.

[17] Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 1.

[18] Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 3.

[HRW31-19] Human Rights Watch. p. 31

[20] Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. The Maquiladora reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA. p. 42.

[kelly48-21] Kelly, Mary E. Free Trade: The Politics of Toxic Waste. p. 48

[22] Clapp, Jennifer. Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA's Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico. p. 25.

[23] CorpWatch. Maquiladoras at a Glance.

[24] Sklair, Leslie. Assembling For Development: The Maquila Industry in Mexico and the United States. p. 94.

[25] US-Mexico Border 2012 Program

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 ==Working conditions==
-One of the main goals of the Border Industrialization Program was to attract foreign investment.  In order to do that, Mexican labor is kept cheap and competitive with other major export countries to keep the United States firms operating within the Mexican assembly plants. Mexican women work for approximately one-sixth of the U.S. hourly rate.<ref>''The Human Race: Escaping From History''.</ref> Employee turnover is also relatively high, reaching up to 80 percent in some maquiladoras, due in part to stress and health threats common to this type of labor.<ref>Kourous, George. ''Workers' Health is on the Line: Occupational Health and Safety in the Maquiladoras''. p. 52.</ref>
+One of the main goals of the Border Industrialization Program was to attract foreign investment.  To do that, Mexican labor is kept cheap and competitive with other major export countries to keep the United States firms operating within the Mexican assembly plants. Mexican women work for approximately one-sixth of the U.S. hourly rate.<ref>''The Human Race: Escaping From History''.</ref> Employee turnover is also relatively high, reaching up to 80 percent in some maquiladoras, due in part to stress and health threats common to this type of labor.<ref>Kourous, George. ''Workers' Health is on the Line: Occupational Health and Safety in the Maquiladoras''. p. 52.</ref>
 Workers are paid very low wages (often not a [[living wage]]), live in poor conditions, and have very low job security.<ref>{{cite book|author=Cravy, Altha J.|title=Women and work in Mexico's maquiladoras|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|year=1998|isbn=9780847688869|pages=71-73|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=rVpeJt_o93IC&pg=PA71}}</ref>
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 ==Gender composition of workforce==
-Mexico possesses a strong system of labor laws, yet enforcement of these laws within the maquiladora industry is often lax.<ref>Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. ''The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA''. p. 1.</ref>  While most people who were employed under the original [[Bracero Program]] were men, the majority of maquiladora employees are young women.<ref>Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. ''The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA''. p. 3.</ref>  Women are considered to be preferred to men because women will typically work for cheaper wages, and are easier for male employers to direct.  Some maquiladora operators have admitted a preference for women also because women often display a greater level of patience and higher dexterity than men in performing the repetitive work of an assembly plant. The maquila industry has been accused{{by who?|date=December 2011}} of sexual exploitation of women. Opponents of this allegation{{who?|date=December 2011}} argue that women are paid higher wages working in a maquiladora than they commonly would in other forms of employment in northern Mexico.  In addition, some have argued that maquiladora employment enables women to make their own money and thus become more independent, while teaching them new skills and giving them more opportunities that they may not otherwise acquire.
+Mexico possesses a strong system of labor laws, yet enforcement of these laws within the maquiladora industry is often lax.<ref>Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. ''The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA''. p. 1.</ref>  While most people who were employed under the original [[Bracero Program]] were men, the majority of maquiladora employees are young women.<ref>Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. ''The Maquiladora Reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA''. p. 3.</ref>  Women are preferred to men, because women typically work for cheaper wages and are easier for male employers to direct.  Some maquiladora operators have admitted a preference for women also because women often display a greater level of patience and higher dexterity than men in performing the repetitive work of an assembly plant. The maquila industry has been accused{{by who?|date=December 2011}} of sexual exploitation of women. Opponents of this allegation{{who?|date=December 2011}} argue that women are paid higher wages working in a maquiladora than they commonly would in other forms of employment in northern Mexico.  In addition, some have argued that maquiladora employment enables women to make their own money and thus become more independent, while teaching them new skills and giving them more opportunities that they may not otherwise acquire.
-The maquiladora operators have also been accused of discrimination against child-bearing-aged women in order to keep costs down because Mexico’s labor laws contain extensive maternity requirements.  They often demand pregnancy tests as a prerequisite to employment or insist that female workers use birth control.<ref name=HRW31>Human Rights Watch. p. 31</ref>  If a woman is found to be pregnant, it may likely hinder her chances of getting hired, and if an existing worker becomes pregnant, she may be terminated.<ref name=HRW31 />
+The maquiladora operators have also been accused of discriminating against child-bearing-aged women to keep costs down, because Mexico’s labor laws contain extensive maternity requirements.  They often demand pregnancy tests as a prerequisite to employment or insist that female workers use birth control.<ref name=HRW31>Human Rights Watch. p. 31</ref>  If a woman is found to be pregnant, it may likely hinder her chances of getting hired, and if an existing worker becomes pregnant, she may be terminated.<ref name=HRW31 />
 In recent years, however, there has been a shift toward hiring more male workers due to labor shortages and the emergence of heavier industries operating within maquiladoras.
@@ Line 42: / Line 42: @@
 Much of the [[environmental damage]], particularly in the border region of Mexico, are attributed to Mexico’s economic development strategies and intense industrialization. The dense population of maquiladoras and the inability of Mexico’s environmental regulatory program to keep up with the rapid growth of the industry over the past quarter of a century have contributed to major environmental problems.  Both the United States and Mexican governments claim to be committed to environmental protection, yet environmental policies have not always been enforced.<ref>Kamel, Rachel and Anya Hoffman. ''The Maquiladora reader: Cross-Border Organizing Since NAFTA''. p. 42.</ref>  Although the La Paz Agreement signed by Mexico and the United States in 1983 requires hazardous waste created by United States’ corporations to be transported back to the U.S. for disposal, some companies avoid paying disposal costs by dumping toxins and other waste into Mexico’s rivers or deserts.  The [[United States Environmental Protection Agency]] reports that only 91 of the 600 maquiladoras located along the Texas-Mexico border have returned waste to the United States since 1987.<ref name=kelly48>Kelly, Mary E. ''Free Trade: The Politics of Toxic Waste''. p. 48</ref>
-Mexico’s waste imports have nearly doubled in recent years, and most of this waste comes from the United States.<ref>Clapp, Jennifer. ''Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA's Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico''. p. 25.</ref>  In Mexico, some maquiladoras lack proper waste management facilities and the ability to clean up disposal sites, which is why some of the hazardous waste is illegally disposed of.<ref name=kelly48 />   Environmental hazards associated with some maquiladoras include polluted rivers and contaminated drinking water.  According to the Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP), all streams and rivers in the border region have been ecologically devastated as a consequence of the maquila industry.<ref>CorpWatch. ''Maquiladoras at a Glance''.</ref>  Furthermore, the [[United States Geological Survey]], the state of [[California]], and the Imperial County Health Department have all asserted the [[New River (California)|New River]], which flows from [[Mexicali]] near the border to the [[Salton Sea]] in California to be "the dirtiest river in America".<ref>Sklair, Leslie. ''Assembling For Development: The Maquila Industry in Mexico and the United States''. p. 94.</ref>  Ongoing exposure to toxic wastes can contribute to health problems such as cancer, skin disease, hepatitis, and birth defects.  Furthermore, Mexico does not have any laws requiring industries to publicize basic environmental data on their operations, and so Mexico does not keep a very accurate inventory of hazardous waste.<ref name=kelly48 />
+Mexico’s waste imports have nearly doubled in recent years, and most of this waste comes from the United States.<ref>Clapp, Jennifer. ''Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA's Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico''. p. 25.</ref>  In Mexico, some maquiladoras lack proper waste management facilities and the ability to clean up disposal sites, which is why some of the hazardous waste is illegally disposed of.<ref name=kelly48 />   Environmental hazards associated with some maquiladoras include polluted rivers and contaminated drinking water.  According to the Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP), all streams and rivers in the border region have been ecologically devastated as a consequence of the maquila industry.<ref>CorpWatch. ''Maquiladoras at a Glance''.</ref>  Furthermore, the [[United States Geological Survey]], the state of [[California]], and the Imperial County Health Department have all asserted the [[New River (California)|New River]], which flows from [[Mexicali]] near the border to the [[Salton Sea]] in California to be "...the dirtiest river in America."<ref>Sklair, Leslie. ''Assembling For Development: The Maquila Industry in Mexico and the United States''. p. 94.</ref>  Ongoing exposure to toxic wastes can contribute to health problems such as cancer, skin disease, hepatitis, and birth defects.  Furthermore, Mexico does not have any laws requiring industries to publicize basic environmental data on their operations, and so Mexico does not keep a very accurate inventory of hazardous waste.<ref name=kelly48 />
 The Border 2012 plan devised by the EPA has an extensive plan to help with environmental issues along the US Mexico Border.<ref>[http://www.epa.gov/border2012/ US-Mexico Border 2012 Program]</ref>
@@ Line 69: / Line 69: @@
 ===Journal articles===
 *Brown, Garrett D. "Protecting Workers’ Health and Safety in the Globalizing Economy through International Trade Treaties". ''International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health''. Apr-Jun 2005.
-*Clapp, Jennifer. "Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA’s Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico". ''Alternatives Journal'', Vol. 28, Iss. 2. Waterloo: Spring 2002.
+*Clapp, Jennifer. ''Piles of Poisons: Despite NAFTA’s Green Promises, Hazardous Waste Problems are Deepening in Mexico''. ''Alternatives Journal'', Vol. 28, Iss. 2. Waterloo: Spring 2002.
-*Hampton, Elaine. "Globalization Legacy: A View of U.S. Factory Involvement in Mexican Education". ''Multicultural Education''. Summer 2004.
+*Hampton, Elaine. ''Globalization Legacy: A View of U.S. Factory Involvement in Mexican Education''. ''Multicultural Education''. Summer 2004.
-*Hausman, Angela and Diana L. Haytko. "Cross-Border Supply Chain Relationships: Interpretive Research of Maquiladora Realized Strategies". ''The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing'', Vol 18, Iss. 6/7. Santa Barbara: 2003
+*Hausman, Angela and Diana L. Haytko. ''Cross-Border Supply Chain Relationships: Interpretive Research of Maquiladora Realized Strategies''. ''The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing'', Vol 18, Iss. 6/7. Santa Barbara: 2003
-*Moffatt, Allison. "Murder, Mystery and Mistreatment in Mexican Maquiladoras." ''Women & Environments International Magazines'' 66 (2006): 19.
+*Moffatt, Allison. ''Murder, Mystery and Mistreatment in Mexican Maquiladoras.'' ''Women & Environments International Magazines'' 66 (2006): 19.
-*Villalobos, J. Rene, et al., "Inbound for Mexico". ''Industrial Engineer''. Norcross: April 2004. Vol. 36, Iss. 4.
+*Villalobos, J. Rene, et al., ''Inbound for Mexico''. ''Industrial Engineer''. Norcross: April 2004. Vol. 36, Iss. 4.
 ===Government/NGO reports===
 *Gruben, William C. and Sherry L. Kiser. ''The Border Economy: NAFTA and Maquiladoras: Is the Growth Connected?'' [[Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas]]. June 2001.
-* [[Human Rights Watch]]. "No Guarantees: Sex Discrimination in Mexico’s Maquiladora Sector". ''The Maquiladora Reader''. Philadelphia: Mexico-U.S. Border Program, 1999.
+* [[Human Rights Watch]]. ''No Guarantees: Sex Discrimination in Mexico’s Maquiladora Sector''. ''The Maquiladora Reader''. Philadelphia: Mexico-U.S. Border Program, 1999.
 ===News===
@@ Line 88: / Line 88: @@
 ==External links==
-* [[CorpWatch]], "[http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=1528 Maquiladoras at a Glance]". June 30, 1999.
+* [[CorpWatch]], ''[http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=1528 Maquiladoras at a Glance]''. June 30, 1999.
 *[http://www.imow.org/wpp/stories/viewStory?storyId=116 International Museum of Women Feature on Maquiladoras]

Maquiladora: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:38, 1 February 2012

History

Growth and development

Working conditions

Macroeconomic effects of the maquiladora industry

Gender composition of workforce

Environmental effects

See also

References

Further reading

Books

Journal articles

Government/NGO reports

News

Video

External links