Template:Did you know nominations/Photo Bits: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Fix DYKmake (add username) and rm DYKnom (self nom) |
reply |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> |
:*<!--Make first comment here--> |
||
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Long enough (expanded from 487 characters to 1679) and "new" enough as the expansion occurred on Feb 1 - however the expansion isn't quite five fold as required by the qualifications for newness, but between three and four fold, so should be expanded by another 756 characters (roughly 150 words) to qualify. Might help readability if it were broken up into smaller paragraphs. Otherwise the article is within policy and the hook is well sourced and interesting. [[User:Vale of Glamorgan|Vale of Glamorgan]] ([[User talk:Vale of Glamorgan|talk]]) 19:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Long enough (expanded from 487 characters to 1679) and "new" enough as the expansion occurred on Feb 1 - however the expansion isn't quite five fold as required by the qualifications for newness, but between three and four fold, so should be expanded by another 756 characters (roughly 150 words) to qualify. Might help readability if it were broken up into smaller paragraphs. Otherwise the article is within policy and the hook is well sourced and interesting. [[User:Vale of Glamorgan|Vale of Glamorgan]] ([[User talk:Vale of Glamorgan|talk]]) 19:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Before I expanded, the article was in [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Photo_Bits&oldid=454620546 this form] (193 characters). I expanded it from 193 characters to 1657 characters which is 8.5 times expansion. I have broken up into smaller paragraphs, thanks. --[[User:SupernovaExplosion|SupernovaExplosion]] ([[User talk:SupernovaExplosion|talk]]) 06:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 06:12, 2 February 2012
Photo Bits
- ... that Photo Bits, a British soft porn magazine published from 1898 to 1914, was the first pin-up magazine in the United Kingdom?
Expanded by --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 07:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)). Nominated by SupernovaExplosion (talk) at 07:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Long enough (expanded from 487 characters to 1679) and "new" enough as the expansion occurred on Feb 1 - however the expansion isn't quite five fold as required by the qualifications for newness, but between three and four fold, so should be expanded by another 756 characters (roughly 150 words) to qualify. Might help readability if it were broken up into smaller paragraphs. Otherwise the article is within policy and the hook is well sourced and interesting. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Before I expanded, the article was in this form (193 characters). I expanded it from 193 characters to 1657 characters which is 8.5 times expansion. I have broken up into smaller paragraphs, thanks. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 06:12, 2 February 2012 (UTC)