Jump to content

Talk:Rare (company): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
JohnCD (talk | contribs)
Line 34: Line 34:
* Makes sense to me. The formal name is shorter than the parenthesis! —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 18:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
* Makes sense to me. The formal name is shorter than the parenthesis! —[[User:Tamfang|Tamfang]] ([[User talk:Tamfang|talk]]) 18:29, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a [[WP:RM|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:RM bottom -->

== I miss the old Conker and Banjo ==

I want Nintendo to bring Rare back! Microsoft makes Rare make stupid games now!([[Special:Contributions/99.114.169.92|99.114.169.92]] ([[User talk:99.114.169.92|talk]]) 01:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC))

Revision as of 01:26, 3 February 2012

WikiProject iconComputing B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconVideo games B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Template:WikiProject Xbox

Huge interview/coverage of Rare and its history in Retro Gamer

The December 2010 issue of UK magazine Retro Gamer featured Rare on its covered and included a full 15-page-long interview with four of its members (sorry, the Stampers aren't any of them). If anybody wants a copy of the section to look at in which to expand and cleanup the article, let me know, and I can work a way towards providing you one. –MuZemike 01:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also have an interview (and brief history) of Rare and the Stampers in Nintendo Power's September-October 1988 issue if anybody is interested. –MuZemike 21:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rare

We should write: Rare, Ltd. (1984-2010) is a British video game [...]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walecs (talkcontribs) 09:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About renaming the article to Rare, Ltd.

I will intend to improve this article heavily, but first and foremost, I think the article's name should be changed to Rare, Ltd. I know this was already mentioned before but the current title is unclear and contradictory with the way the article begins ("Rare, Ltd. is a British..."). I suggest we move the article to Rare, Ltd. and then start the article like this: Rare, Ltd. (also known as Rareware or simply as Rare) is a British... <--Niwi3 (talk) 18:57, 08 March 2011 (CET)

Good idea. Drop the comma though, it should be Rare Ltd.. Miremare 18:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I will move it right now. <--Niwi3 (talk) 11:14, 09 March 2011 (CET)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Just don't ask me to do it again - there are fifteen different variants on the name that redirect here, that must be some kind of record! JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Rare (company)Rare Ltd. — The name Rare Ltd. is used in most video games websites and magazines, and it is much more specific about the topic. --Niwi3 (talk) 11:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I miss the old Conker and Banjo

I want Nintendo to bring Rare back! Microsoft makes Rare make stupid games now!(99.114.169.92 (talk) 01:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]