User talk:Runehelmet

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Arminianism The goal of WikiProject Arminianism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Arminianism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Arminianism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Arminian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

Invitation

Hi. I have sent a complaint on the user Yopie. If you have positive or negative experiences with this user and wish to share them, or if you merely can agree with the essence of the mentioned complaint, you are hereby invited to do this.

--- Aaemn784 (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Passport

Hi Runehelmet. As one of the main editors on the Somali-related articles, there's a discussion on the Somali passport going on here where your input would be appreciated. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Minor edits

Hi Runehelmet. First let me say that even if I don't always agree with you, I want to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia (I've seen your commitment to Somali-related articles), and I greatly appreciate your willingness to talk things through.

That said, can I ask that you not mark edits as minor unless they actually are minor? As you have had your disagreements with User:Soupforone at least once before, this is clearly a matter of disagreement, and should not be marked as minor. As WP:MINOR states:

"Reverting a page is not likely to be considered minor under most circumstances. When the status of a page is disputed, and particularly if an edit war is brewing, then it is better not to mark any edit as minor. Reverting blatant vandalism is an exception to this rule."

Thanks and regards, Quintucket (talk) 20:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

I see. But some disagreements are minor, therefor i mark it as 'minor'. But i'll try to avoid this in the future. Runehelmet (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks :•) --Quintucket (talk) 20:52, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

UN Security Council

I have noticed you dispute on the UNSC members page, and with respect you are missing the point of the Arab representative on the council. Being the Arab representative is an official position for one of the states on the council, they are elected as both Arab and African/Asian representative. Somalia was only on the council as an African state, for the time it was on the council Syria and Sudan were the official Arab representatives, whether or not Somalia was also an Arab state.

In summery, the note about the Arab state is not an invention of Wikipedia, it was an official UN title. Unless you can go back in time to 1971 when Somalia was elected to the council it makes no difference whether Somalia is an Arab state or not, that is irrelevant in this case as it was not given the title for its time on the council.--23230 ^talk 16:04, 5 February 2012 (UTC)