User talk:217.131.129.81: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:04, 13 February 2012

Operatinon Stell

"Turkish victory" yazılabilmesi için güvenilir kaynaklar lazım. Takabeg (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

peki hangi güvenilir kaynağa dayandırılarak "unsuccessful" yazılmış? bu terör örgütü propagandasını kaldıralım.

burada.Takabeg (talk) 10:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yani TSK nisbeten başarısız olmuş diyor. Yani beklendiği kadar başarı elde edilmemiş... demek. Takabeg (talk) 10:21, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kime göre, neye göre? Operasyonun hedefine ulaşıldı mı ulaşılamadı mı buna ancak Türk ordusu karar verebilir. Amaç eğer ağır zayiat verdirmek idiyse bunda başarılı olunmuş...

UNHCR'e göre öylemiş. TSK ve PKK burada taraftar oldukları için kendilerinin iddiaları yani biz kazandık gibisinde ilanları geçersizdir. Diğer organizasyonlar, enstitüler ve araştırmacıların ne dedikleri aktarilabilir. Bulabildiğinde eklersin. Takabeg (talk) 10:30, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly what is wrong with the article as it stands? The article explains that a majority of both the two armies were killed in the battle, so the battle was inconclusive as such; however, in the long term, it meant defeat for the Serbs because Turks could bring more troops into the war. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also please note that Wikipedia has a three revert rule; a user should not revert the same article more than three times within 24 hours; users who violate it or otherwise engage in revert warring may be blocked from editing. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:01, 13 February 2012 edit Mike Rosoft (talk \| contribs) Administrators 67,165 edits Question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:04, 13 February 2012 edit undo Mike Rosoft (talk \| contribs) Administrators 67,165 edits Follow-up Next edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Exactly what is wrong with the article as it stands? The article explains that a majority of both the two armies were killed in the battle, so the battle was inconclusive as such; however, in the long term, it meant defeat for the Serbs because Turks could bring more troops into the war. - [[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft\|talk]]) 21:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)		Exactly what is wrong with the article as it stands? The article explains that a majority of both the two armies were killed in the battle, so the battle was inconclusive as such; however, in the long term, it meant defeat for the Serbs because Turks could bring more troops into the war. - [[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft\|talk]]) 21:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
			* Also please note that Wikipedia has a [[WP:3RR\|three revert rule]]; a user should not revert the same article more than three times within 24 hours; users who violate it or otherwise engage in [[WP:EW\|revert warring]] may be [[WP:BLOCK\|blocked]] from editing. - [[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] ([[User talk:Mike Rosoft\|talk]]) 21:04, 13 February 2012 (UTC)