User talk:Xorox: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+response |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::: Netscott, I followed your suggestions and moved Anderson to the Militants section because he is convicted of espionage for Al Qaeda. I hope it is OK by now. --[[User:Xorox|Xorox]] 11:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
::: Netscott, I followed your suggestions and moved Anderson to the Militants section because he is convicted of espionage for Al Qaeda. I hope it is OK by now. --[[User:Xorox|Xorox]] 11:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::: Xorox, that seems better. Anderson is a tough one, because his case did involve terrorism through Al-Qaeda, but he wasn't charged with terrorism and didn't appear suspected of it. I notice that you're [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_converts_to_Islam&diff=47789338&oldid=47788933 removing] converts without editorial commentary. When you're making edits please be sure to do you best to explain your edits in the editorial commentary section. Such removal of content without explanation is frowned upon here at WikiPedia. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 11:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
:::: Xorox, that seems better. Anderson is a tough one, because his case did involve terrorism through Al-Qaeda, but he wasn't charged with terrorism and didn't appear suspected of it. I notice that you're [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=List_of_converts_to_Islam&diff=47789338&oldid=47788933 removing] converts without editorial commentary. When you're making edits please be sure to do you best to explain your edits in the editorial commentary section. Such removal of content without explanation is frowned upon here at WikiPedia. [[User:Netscott|Netscott]] 11:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
::::: I removed them because there were no articles about them. If we have to include every convert to islam, it will be quite boring. Of one, the reference was even missing. OK, I will keepit in mind the next time and document. Thank you for the suggestion. --[[User:Xorox|Xorox]] 12:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:00, 10 April 2006
Welcome!
Hi Xorox! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Netscott 11:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed that you added an empty section to List of converts to Islam. I've removed it because it served no purpose and seemed a bit disrespectful, I hope you don't mind. Netscott 11:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- You should know that despite my having edited in the "suspected terrorists" section you created, I am not really inclined to support it. To me the term "suspected" is something that should be avoided in an Encyclopedia. I created the "Convicts on charges of terrorism" section solely due to the fact that every individual listed in that section is there based upon cold hard facts. If you intend for the "suspected" terrorists section to remain, I strongly advise you to cite in the article which government/organization is the entity doing the "suspecting" and also add reliable source ref. citations to each individual listed. Netscott 11:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Netscott, I followed your suggestions and moved Anderson to the Militants section because he is convicted of espionage for Al Qaeda. I hope it is OK by now. --Xorox 11:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Xorox, that seems better. Anderson is a tough one, because his case did involve terrorism through Al-Qaeda, but he wasn't charged with terrorism and didn't appear suspected of it. I notice that you're removing converts without editorial commentary. When you're making edits please be sure to do you best to explain your edits in the editorial commentary section. Such removal of content without explanation is frowned upon here at WikiPedia. Netscott 11:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- I removed them because there were no articles about them. If we have to include every convert to islam, it will be quite boring. Of one, the reference was even missing. OK, I will keepit in mind the next time and document. Thank you for the suggestion. --Xorox 12:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Xorox, that seems better. Anderson is a tough one, because his case did involve terrorism through Al-Qaeda, but he wasn't charged with terrorism and didn't appear suspected of it. I notice that you're removing converts without editorial commentary. When you're making edits please be sure to do you best to explain your edits in the editorial commentary section. Such removal of content without explanation is frowned upon here at WikiPedia. Netscott 11:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- Netscott, I followed your suggestions and moved Anderson to the Militants section because he is convicted of espionage for Al Qaeda. I hope it is OK by now. --Xorox 11:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- You should know that despite my having edited in the "suspected terrorists" section you created, I am not really inclined to support it. To me the term "suspected" is something that should be avoided in an Encyclopedia. I created the "Convicts on charges of terrorism" section solely due to the fact that every individual listed in that section is there based upon cold hard facts. If you intend for the "suspected" terrorists section to remain, I strongly advise you to cite in the article which government/organization is the entity doing the "suspecting" and also add reliable source ref. citations to each individual listed. Netscott 11:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)