Wikipedia:Peer review/Charles Lindbergh/archive2: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Charles Lindbergh: cmt |
→Charles Lindbergh: tfc to my comment |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
;Question |
;Question |
||
Collect, PR is for eliciting feedback for article improvement, not for dispute resolutions. It seems like you think you know what may or may not be wrong with the article, although Centpacrr (one of the major contributors) seems to disagree. What do you wish to accomplish here at PR? <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:red">yllo</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">submarine</span>]])</small> 22:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
Collect, PR is for eliciting feedback for article improvement, not for dispute resolutions. It seems like you think you know what may or may not be wrong with the article, although Centpacrr (one of the major contributors) seems to disagree. What do you wish to accomplish here at PR? <span style="font-family:verdana">[[User:Yllosubmarine|María]] </span><small>([[User talk:Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:red">yllo</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Yllosubmarine|<span style="color:green">submarine</span>]])</small> 22:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
:See the extensive discussions [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Charles_Lindbergh|'''here''']] and [[Talk:Charles_Lindbergh#.22Fleeing_Lindberghs.22|'''here''']] where I have addressed User:Collect's issue with a single word in great detail. His/her posting here seems to me to be more for the purpose of canvassing and/or forum shopping then any improvement of this long standing and mature article. [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr|talk]]) 22:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
:See the extensive discussions [[Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Charles_Lindbergh|'''here''']] and [[Talk:Charles_Lindbergh#.22Fleeing_Lindberghs.22|'''here''']] where I have addressed User:Collect's issue with a well sourced single word ("fleeing") in great detail. His/her posting here thus seems to me to be more for the purpose of canvassing and/or forum shopping then any improvement of this long standing and mature article. [[User:Centpacrr|Centpacrr]] ([[User talk:Centpacrr|talk]]) 22:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:14, 20 February 2012
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because… I think that it is a trifle bloated and quite oddly written. It may also contain material of trivial or no relevance to the biography, or which may be a copyvio.
Thanks, Collect (talk) 13:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Please explain what exactly you mean by "oddly written" and identify what specific material are you claiming as being in copyright violation. Thank you. Centpacrr (talk) 23:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Question
Collect, PR is for eliciting feedback for article improvement, not for dispute resolutions. It seems like you think you know what may or may not be wrong with the article, although Centpacrr (one of the major contributors) seems to disagree. What do you wish to accomplish here at PR? María (yllosubmarine) 22:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- See the extensive discussions here and here where I have addressed User:Collect's issue with a well sourced single word ("fleeing") in great detail. His/her posting here thus seems to me to be more for the purpose of canvassing and/or forum shopping then any improvement of this long standing and mature article. Centpacrr (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2012 (UTC)