Talk:Potassium sorbate: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 188.66.78.30 - "→Toxicology: " |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Toxicology== |
==Toxicology== |
||
I am a cosmetic manufacturer, and I not only have allergy from the use of very small amounts of potassium sorbate, but 10% of the volunteers that test it, also report skin irritation. It's uncompreensible how such authorities claim that only a tiny percentage of the population report allergies. |
|||
I am so allergic to this chemical yet this webpage makes it sound harmless. It causes such an extreme reaction to my eczema that it makes me furious that this page has not been updated. Many people have reactions to this chemical, just google its side effects. |
I am so allergic to this chemical yet this webpage makes it sound harmless. It causes such an extreme reaction to my eczema that it makes me furious that this page has not been updated. Many people have reactions to this chemical, just google its side effects. |
||
Revision as of 22:26, 22 February 2012
Food and drink Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||
|
Chemicals Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Toxicology
I am a cosmetic manufacturer, and I not only have allergy from the use of very small amounts of potassium sorbate, but 10% of the volunteers that test it, also report skin irritation. It's uncompreensible how such authorities claim that only a tiny percentage of the population report allergies.
I am so allergic to this chemical yet this webpage makes it sound harmless. It causes such an extreme reaction to my eczema that it makes me furious that this page has not been updated. Many people have reactions to this chemical, just google its side effects.
RUBBISH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.66.78.30 (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The Toxicology section has problems "Allergic reactions are very rare and it is well tolerated when administered internally." refers to a specific clinical trial about tube feeding, not to the general population. The rest of it reads like an industry pamphlet. Krisjohn 07:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- It may read like an industry pamphlet, you removed the only scientific source which states that it is pretty safe (tube feeding is still eating, and I hope that the group of people tested is a subset of the population. Off course there are always downsides to compounds, and your addition of the other information is OK, though I would like to see scientific references for those as well. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
I see nothing that supports the claims for behavioral effects in any of the listed sources. Plus, they look very dubious to me - fedupwithfoodadditives.info? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.61.233 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 27 December 2006
- The last five references under the toxicology section are unreliable references. I will remove the troll references. --Organic Flavor 21:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Someone has disputed the non-irritating classification by citing an extremely dubious link - http://www.beok.co.il, which appears to be a site where anyone can just throw up an article. The article linked to in this case appears to have no information about the author available. I think this dubious indication should be removed unless a valid source can be found. 173.228.123.66 (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Since this statement was based on a source that shouldn't be considered reliable (WP:RS, WP:MEDRS), I have simply removed it. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Validation work for.....these reports....
- http://grande.nal.usda.gov/ibids/index.php?mode2=detail&origin=ibids_references&therow=663590
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635512
- http://grande.nal.usda.gov/ibids/index.php?mode2=detail&origin=ibids_references&therow=307101
--222.64.223.42 (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
--222.64.223.42 (talk) 12:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Validation? What validation? Astronaut (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Look at the following editions, which have been mucked off....
--222.64.223.252 (talk) 00:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- What? I don't understand why you provide this link here? Astronaut (talk) 02:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
affectionately?
'Also known affectionately as "wine stabilizer" '
I don't know the first thing about potassium sorbate, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and remove that particular adverb.