Talk:Cockiness (Love It)/GA1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:24, 26 February 2012

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be taking this review. As this is my fourth or fifth review for this nominator, he should know what to expect. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Good
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	See below
	2c. it contains no original research.	Good
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Good
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Good
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 | '''2.''' {{GAC|2}}: <!-- Verifiable. Add comments to the ends of the lines below (after |). -->
 |
-{{GATable/item|2a||}}
+{{GATable/item|2a|+|Good}}
-{{GATable/item|2b||}}
+{{GATable/item|2b||See below}}
-{{GATable/item|2c||}}
+{{GATable/item|2c|+|Good}}
 |- valign="top"
 |
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ===Comments===
+;2b
+*What makes DJ Booth a reliable source?