Jump to content

User talk:70.25.91.205: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Geedubber (talk | contribs)
Rachel Marsden
Line 4: Line 4:


Could you explain your major edit and removal of content from the Rachel Marsden page? Much of that information seemed relevant. Please [[User talk:Jfingers88|contact me]] about this. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color="darkgreen">Jfing</font>]][[User:Jfingers88/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]]<font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">s</font>[[User Talk:Jfingers88|<font color="blue">88</font>]] 01:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Could you explain your major edit and removal of content from the Rachel Marsden page? Much of that information seemed relevant. Please [[User talk:Jfingers88|contact me]] about this. [[User:Jfingers88|<font color="darkgreen">Jfing</font>]][[User:Jfingers88/Esperanza|<font color="green">'''e'''</font>]]<font color="blue">r</font><font color="black">s</font>[[User Talk:Jfingers88|<font color="blue">88</font>]] 01:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

That is the third time you have removed large sections from the Rachel Marsden page within the last couple of days. If there are specific details on the page that you have a factual beef with, please say so in the article's talk page instead of making large edits. Please read [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule]] because you were on the cusp of breaking it.--[[User:Geedubber|Geedubber]] 09:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:55, 11 April 2006

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Johnleemk | Talk 18:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain your major edit and removal of content from the Rachel Marsden page? Much of that information seemed relevant. Please contact me about this. Jfingers88 01:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is the third time you have removed large sections from the Rachel Marsden page within the last couple of days. If there are specific details on the page that you have a factual beef with, please say so in the article's talk page instead of making large edits. Please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule because you were on the cusp of breaking it.--Geedubber 09:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]